0
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part of this empire continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The political result of the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was that the lands of this part of the empire were carved up by the Germanic invaders and by former Germanic allies of the Romans.
The Vandals and Alans formed the kingdom of the Vandals in northern Tunisia and Eastern Algeria. The Visigoths formed their kingdom in Spain and Portugal. The Sueves formed their kingdom in north-western Spain. The Burgundians formed their kingdom in eastern France. The Franks expanded their kingdom into northern and central France. The Alemanni took over north-eastern France (Alsace and Lorraine) Switzerland and Austria. The Visigoths took over Italy, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia. Eventually the Franks took over the whole of France and the lands of the Alemanni.
The political results of the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part of this empire continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years) was that the lands of this empire were carved up by the Germanic invaders and by former Germanic allies of the Romans.
The Vandals and Alans formed the kingdom of the Vandals in northern Tunisia and Eastern Algeria. The Visigoths formed their kingdom in Spain and Portugal. The Sueves formed their kingdom in north-western Spain. The Burgundians formed their kingdom in eastern France. The Franks expanded their kingdom into northern and central France. The Alemanni took over north-eastern France (Alsace and Lorraine) Switzerland and Austria. The Visigoths took over Italy, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia. Eventually the Franks took over the whole of France and the lands of the Alemanni.
Your phrasing is unclear. I will assume that you mean the effects of the fall of the Roman Empire. The Germanic invaders formed their own kingdoms in the lands they conquered: the Kingdom of the Visigoths in Spain and south-western France, The Kingdom of the Burgundians in Eastern France, the kingdom of the Franks in Holland south if the river Rhine, Belgium and northern and central France. The Alemanni took over Switzerland and the northeaster of France. The Ostrogoths took over Italy. The Vandals formed a kingdom in northwest Africa, but they were evicted by the eastern Roman Empire. Eventually the Franks took over the whole of France and the lands of the Alemanni and became the dominant power.
More generally, the aristocracy of the conquering Germanic peoples became ruling classes in Europe. They were warrior elites and established the aristocracy of the Middle Ages and of today. There was the development of Medieval society.
it was the fault of augutus ceaser because he didn't believe in Christianity nor peace
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the fall of rome like?
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
What are the many reasons historains give for the fall of the roman empire?
It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.It seems that every historian has his/her own theory as to why the Roman empire fell. You can get reasons such as a weakened army, lack of leadership, economic factors and even lead poisoning for the fall and they would all be correct. Most agree that there was no one factor that caused the fall of Rome, but a combination of external and internal pressures that caused the fall.
But why did the roman empire fall?
Political factors: offices became viewed as burdens, military interfered with politics, civil war and unrest after the good emperors were gone, division of the empire, and moving the capitol to Byzantium (AKA Constantinople). Social factors: lack of interest in public affairs, low confidence, disloyalty, corruption, HUGE contrast between rich and poor, disease and food shortage. Economic factors: poor harvests, trade disruption, no war plunder, inflation, high taxes, and again HUGE gap between rich and poor. Military factors: invasion from tribes, low funds for defense, less and less soldiers, and low patriotism and loyalty to Rome. MOST important cause: Invasion by Germanic tribes and Huns.
How did Augustus become the emperor of rome?
Caesar defeats Pompey's forces and enters Rome, triumphant and unchallenged. He makes himself dictator and absolute ruler of Rome and its territories. Caesar founds many colonies in newly conquered territories and provides land and opportunity for poor Romans who choose to migrate there. He reduces the number of slaves and opens citizenship to people livingin the provinces. Finally, he creates a new calendar named the Julian calendar. This very calendar, with a few minor adjustments, is the same one used around the world today.
What form of government was born in Rome?
Two forms of government disappeared from ancient Rome; the monarchy and the republic.Two forms of government disappeared from ancient Rome; the monarchy and the republic.Two forms of government disappeared from ancient Rome; the monarchy and the republic.Two forms of government disappeared from ancient Rome; the monarchy and the republic.Two forms of government disappeared from ancient Rome; the monarchy and the republic.Two forms of government disappeared from ancient Rome; the monarchy and the republic.Two forms of government disappeared from ancient Rome; the monarchy and the republic.Two forms of government disappeared from ancient Rome; the monarchy and the republic.Two forms of government disappeared from ancient Rome; the monarchy and the republic.
Why is it to simplistic to blame the fall of Rome on one issue?
Because there are many reasons why Rome fell, such as economic problems, political corruption, and excessive military spendings. So one reason would be too simplistic to blame it all on one problem.
What was one of the great contributions of rome to political philosophy?
citizenship
Was there one person who really helped the collapse of Rome?
No. It's impossible to blame one person for the collapse of Rome. The fall of Rome was not a spontaneous thing. It took place over many years and there were many causes.No. It's impossible to blame one person for the collapse of Rome. The fall of Rome was not a spontaneous thing. It took place over many years and there were many causes.No. It's impossible to blame one person for the collapse of Rome. The fall of Rome was not a spontaneous thing. It took place over many years and there were many causes.No. It's impossible to blame one person for the collapse of Rome. The fall of Rome was not a spontaneous thing. It took place over many years and there were many causes.No. It's impossible to blame one person for the collapse of Rome. The fall of Rome was not a spontaneous thing. It took place over many years and there were many causes.No. It's impossible to blame one person for the collapse of Rome. The fall of Rome was not a spontaneous thing. It took place over many years and there were many causes.No. It's impossible to blame one person for the collapse of Rome. The fall of Rome was not a spontaneous thing. It took place over many years and there were many causes.No. It's impossible to blame one person for the collapse of Rome. The fall of Rome was not a spontaneous thing. It took place over many years and there were many causes.No. It's impossible to blame one person for the collapse of Rome. The fall of Rome was not a spontaneous thing. It took place over many years and there were many causes.
One of the great contributions of Rome to political philosophy was the idea of .?
citizenship
One of the great contributions of Rome to political philosophy was the idea of?
One of the great contributions of Rome, if not the greatest, was the concept of the personal rights of citizens.
How did deoclitian try to reverse the fall of rome?
Diocletian tried to reverse the fall of Rome by dividing the Empire into four parts. He thought that the place was to big for just one person.
Who made himself dictator in anicent rome?
No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.
What one political result of the fall of rome?
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part of this empire continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The political result of the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was that the lands of this part of the empire were carved up by the Germanic invaders and by former Germanic allies of the Romans. The Vandals and Alans formed the kingdom of the Vandals in northern Tunisia and Eastern Algeria. The Visigoths formed their kingdom in Spain and Portugal. The Sueves formed their kingdom in north-western Spain. The Burgundians formed their kingdom in eastern France. The Franks expanded their kingdom into northern and central France. The Alemanni took over north-eastern France (Alsace and Lorraine) Switzerland and Austria. The Visigoths took over Italy, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia. Eventually the Franks took over the whole of France and the lands of the Alemanni.
Why was there a fall in ROme?
There was not a fall in Rome. The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
Did bankruptcy cause Rome to fall?
sort of, there are alot of things that led to the fall. overspending of the goverment/ empror and people was one of the cases yes - pk...
One of the greatest contributions of rome to political philosophy was the idea of?
One of the greatest contributions of Rome to political philosophy was the concept of a republic, where power is held by the citizens through elected representatives. This idea of a system of checks and balances and the rule of law has influenced political thought for centuries.
Was the black plague after the fall of Rome?
The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.The epidemic that we call the Black Death or the Black Plague occurred well after the fall of Rome in Medieval times. However ancient Rome did have several outbreaks of plague and it was one of the reasons that he wealthy liked to get out of the city during the heat of the summer.
