answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Charlemagne and the Byzantine Emperors ruled countries with the same name, Empire of the Roman People. Since the Byzantines got the name first, they were a bit upset when Charlemagne took it.

Please see the related question below for more information.

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What do Charlemagne and Byzantine emperors have in common?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the list of emperors of the byzantine empire?

me


Where was the byzantine emperors throne room?

Byzantium


Who paid for the byzantine art?

Byzantine art was paid for mostly by emperors and the Orthodox church.


Which statement accurately compares the Byzantine emperors Justinian I and Basil I?

Both emperors improved the Byzantine legal system by organizing laws more clearly.


What is the similarity of the incas and byzantine?

they both had governed emperors


Which emperors actions led to the beginning of the byzantine empire?

Diocletian


Many experts believe who was the greatest of the Byzantine emperors?

Justinian I


Who restored power and glory to the Byzantine Empire?

The Emperors Justinian and Basil II


Did the pope struggle for power against the byzantine emperors and lead to a schism in Christianity?

Yes.


How frequently did leaders change in the byzantine empire?

It varied. The Byzantine emperors reigned for life. Some of the emperors reigned for along time, while others died shorty after their accession to power. The length of the reign of emperors also depended on the political stability of he empire. The empire went thought periods of instability which was usurper emperors and/or civil wars. In such periods power changed hands quickly.


How did the byzantine emperors view their rule in the church?

In the Orthodox the emperor claims authority over all religious leaders. And in the Roman Catholic the pope claims authority over all kings and emperors.


Why were eastern emperor more powerful than those in the west (the byzantines)?

Yes and No. Comparing Byzantine emperors with Charlemagne in the time of 800 to 814 is comparing them with the one person who was probably the most powerful monarch of the Middle Ages. Later Byzantine emperors would have to be compared with western emperors of the Holy Roman Empire of their own times. Most of the emperors of the Holy Roman Empire were rather weak. This was partly because they were elected, and so there was no father to prepare the throne for them, but it was mostly because they had powerful feudal vassals, including kings, who limited their authority. Of course the Byzantine Empire gradually declined through the entire Middle Ages, leaving a rather decrepit country in the end, and an emperor of this country had no more power than his country did, and the Holy Roman Emperor had much more power than the Byzantine Emperor.