0
It was the western part of the Roman Empire which fell. It fell under the weight of invasions by Germanic people. The invaders took over more and more lands of this part of the empire, which ended up being in possession of only Italy and an area of central Gaul and finally lost these as well. The eastern part of this empire was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years.
In 406 The Vandals, Seuves, and Alans invaded Gaul, plundered it and then moved to Spain. The Burgundians also entered Gaul and then formed a kingdom in eastern France. The Alemanni took over Alsace (in north-eastern France) and Switzerland. The Vandals and Alans soon left Spain and conquered the Roman territories in north-western Africa. The Romans found it difficult to deal with so many invaders.
Conflict with the Visigoths (who had been allowed to settle in the eastern part of the empire) compounded the problems. Their disgruntled king Alaric I invaded Italy, but was defeated by Stilicho, the commander of the army of the western part of the Roman Empire. To deal with this Stilicho had to redeploy troops from the frontier in Gaul to Italy, which weakened this border, making it easier for the other Germanic peoples to invade Gaul. Stilicho then reached a settlement with Alaric I, but Honorius, the young and incompetent emperor of the west, was swayed by Stilicho's political opponents and had him executed. The empire lost the man who was capable to defend the empire effectively and an able statesman. Honorius then mishandled a dispute with Alaric and this led to Alaric besieging Rome three times and sacking it on the third occasion. The Visigoths then moved to south-eastern France and eventually formed a kingdom there and expanded into Spain taking it over from the Sueves.
At one point, two failed attempts at invasion by the Huns, first in Gaul and then in Italy, also made it difficult for the Romans to deal with the invaders, especially the Vandals in Africa who were conducting disruptive naval raids on the Italian coast. Three years later the Vandals sacked Rome.
The Romans failed to dislodge the invaders and to prevent their further expansion into Roman lands. The invaders were too spread out and attempts concentrate on repelling them in one area l could mean that other invaders could not be prevented for expanding in other areas. Only one emperor managed to temporarily reconquer many lands. He recovered most of Gaul and Spain, but could not recover Africa, which had been conquered by the Vandals. One large-scale and very expensive joint attempt by the eastern and western parts of the empire to dislodge the Vandals was botched. The losses of the provinces of the empire, particularly Africa which was wealthy and a major supplier of grain for Rome, also mean a loss of tax revenues for the Roman state.
The Romans also lost political cohesion. The remaining areas of the empire were under the control of generals .Several of them were Germanic soldiers who had been recruited in the Roman army and had risen through the ranks. The Romans had come to rely heavily on Germanic soldiers. Most of the last emperors were deposed by force. Towards of the end, the generals wielded the real power. A commander-in-chief of the Army, Ricimer, a Germanic, deposed three emperors, installed two puppet emperors and was the real power holder. After his death another puppet emperor was installed by Gundobad, a general and Ricimer's nephew. An emperor appointed by the emperor of the east was deposed by Orestes, another Germanic general. He installed his teenage son as a puppet emperor, who was shortly after was deposed by a rebellion by Germanic soldiers stationed in Italy.
What is the glue that holds a society, a city-state, a republic or a democracy of people together? Is it not the allegiance, the fidelity and loyalty pledged and given by the people to a idea of government? Is allegiance and fidelity and loyalty not given in exchange for a secure enviorment in which to live and provide for ones family and the society as a whole? What happens? Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. From within and without come the mascaraded enemies of discontent, selfishness and greed. Slowly they begin to erode the glue which binds all together. Such was the demise of Rome.
Slavery
Taxation grew
Public corruption
Military disloyalty
Decline in agriculture
Education grew out of reach
Distributing news became hard
There are many different explanations for why Rome fell. Some arguments, however, insist that Rome never really fell so much as very slowly declined. Some factors that affected this fall or "decline" include the invasions carried out by Barbarian tribes, financial troubles, overexpansion, corruption, the Huns, and more.
The term the fall of Rome does not refer to the fall of the city of Rome, but to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire.
The western part of the Roman Empire crumbled under the weight of the Germanic invasions. The Vandals, Alans (an Iranian-speaking people) Sueves and Burgundians invaded Gaul in 406. The Alemanni from southern Germany took advantage of this to seize Lorraine (in notheastern France) and Switzerland. Eventually, the Germanic peoples took over all the territories of the western part of the Roman Empire except for Italy. The Burgundians took over Burgundy and part of the Rhone valley (in eastern France) and established the Burgundian kingdom. The Vandals and Alans eventually took over the Roman territories in northwestern Africa and established the kingdom of the Vandals. The Visigoths (who had been allowed to settle in the eastern part of the Roman Empire) moved to southwestern France and then took over Spain and Portugal, establishing the Visigoth Kingdom there. The Franks (who had been allowed to settle in the area of Holland south of the river Rhine and Belgium of the western part of the Roman Empire) took over the last Roman territories in Gaul, which were in central France. The Angles, Saxons and Jutes from northern Germany and the Frisians from northern Holland migrated to England in waves and eventually took it over.
Under the weight of these invasions, the western part of the Roman Empire lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a sting of usurpers.
The eastern part of the Roman Empire was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for another 1,000 years.
Some of the internal problems contributing to the fall of the western Roman empire was the lack of defense, the economy, (they had no new sources of revenue) , the civil unrest caused by the various Christian sects fighting each other and the general lack of unity.
the replacement of latin language with greek lanuage
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the decline and fall of Rome about?
If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.
Who helped the decline of the Roman Empire?
Boadicea helped with the decline of the Roman Empire.
A major effect of the decline of the roman empire was that western Europe?
One of the major causes for the Fall of Roman Empire was the Antagonism between the Senate and the Emperor
A major reason for the decline of the Roman Empire was?
political corruption and the instability of the government.
The lessons of late Han China and late Roman Empire are that the decline of a civilization?
The lesson is that the decline of a civilization is not simply the result of attack by outside invaders.
Which were the causes for the decline of the roman empire?
An overemphasis on military service. The fall of Christianity. Extremely low inflation.
What is the decline and fall of Rome about?
If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.If you mean the book, The History of the Decline and all of the Roman Empire, it is about exactly what its title says. It covers the causes and conditions that were detrimental to the empire.
Did the Roman Empire fall because of internal or external problems?
The western Roman Empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.
Who helped the decline of the Roman Empire?
Boadicea helped with the decline of the Roman Empire.
Who was the author of history of the decline and fall of the roman empire?
Edward Gibbon wrote The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.
What was the date of the decline of the roman empire?
There is not a date for it. The decline of the empire was a gradual process, not an event.
What problems contributed to the decline of the Roman rebublic?
The political instability, economic and social problems, and weakening frontiers cause the decline of the Roman Empire.
What age emerged after the roman empire?
After the height of the Roman Empire comes the decline of the Roman Empire
A major effect of the decline of the roman empire was that western Europe?
One of the major causes for the Fall of Roman Empire was the Antagonism between the Senate and the Emperor
What document helped explain the decline of the Roman Empire?
No particular document explains the decline of the Roman Empire. Historians have elaborated this notion from the writings of several Roman and Greek authors. Some historians even challenge this notion of a decline of this empire.
Era of decline upon the collapse of the roman empire is called?
Era of decline upon the collapse of the roman empire is called Fall of Rome
Who is the author for Deciline and fall of the roman empire?
The author of "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" is Edward Gibbon.
