answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

the main difference is reliability, written history generally is recorded closer to the event

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How does oral history differ from written history?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How does oral tradition differ from a written source?

history is normally written down and oral tradition isn't.


Is oral history written down?

Oral means spoken, so no. But it can be written down later, at which time it is written history, not oral history.


How might oral history differ from written history?

It can be changed as it's told from one person to another. Like the telephone game...it rarely ends the way it started.


What has the author Mary M Flekke written?

Mary M. Flekke has written: 'Oral history' -- subject(s): Bibliography, History, Sources, Oral history


What has the author Mark Amodio written?

Mark Amodio has written: 'Writing the oral tradition' -- subject(s): English poetry, History, History and criticism, Oral communication, Oral tradition, Oral-formulaic analysis, Written communication


What has the author Linda A Barnickel written?

Linda A Barnickel has written: 'Oral history for the family historian' -- subject(s): Genealogy, Local History, Methodology, Oral history


Oral or written records of the past?

history


What has the author Manfred J Waserman written?

Manfred J. Waserman has written: 'Bibliography on oral history' -- subject(s): Bibliography, Oral history


What has the author Shona Kennealy written?

Shona Kennealy has written: 'Oral histories of Wanneroo Wetlands' -- subject(s): Wetlands, Oral history, History


How does oral tradition differ from written source?

Oral tradition is information passed down through generations by word of mouth, while written sources are recorded information in written form. Oral tradition tends to be more fluid and changeable, influenced by the storyteller, while written sources are usually more fixed and can be referenced repeatedly. Written sources allow for greater precision and detail, while oral tradition relies on memory and interpretation.


History that is spoken not written?

That is called oral tradition.


What has the author Robert Perks written?

Robert Perks has written: 'The oral history reader'