they were a quick attack
grossflamen flamethrower and
There were no patrols in no mans land...
Early in the war they weren't particularly effective. They were decent at recon but nothing else. As the war progressed and technological advances improved their abilities to shoot and drop bombs, they became very effective weapons.
millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1 millions died in world war 1
The flamethrower had a significant psychological and tactical impact during World War I, instilling fear and demoralization among enemy troops. Its use in trench warfare allowed for direct assaults on fortified positions, creating chaos and destruction within enemy lines. While it was not widely adopted due to its limited range and the dangers it posed to the operator, the flamethrower marked a notable shift in the nature of combat, emphasizing the brutal and horrific aspects of modern warfare.
Nipples
germany
Germany.
It was Germany that first used flamethrowers as weapons in World War I.
the flamer caused over 300 deaths in world war one
flamethrower,tank,machine,planes
it took three i think
The M1A1 Flamethrower was develped in 1941 by the German Army in World War 1. They could require up to 3 soldiers to move the system around the battlefield.
NO
Mostly to clear out enemy trenches and take control of no mans land
grossflamen flamethrower and
yes