0
Why was the US Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott case controversial?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
It was not the (expected) ruling against Scott's freedom that caused the controversy.
It was the reason given - that they claimed slavery was protected by the Constitution. If taken literally, this would invalidate all of the compromises between North and South, and make slavery legal in any state of the Union.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThe court decision stated that slaves were property. This had been thought, but not made into law.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are facts about the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
Where did the Dred Scott Decision occur?
In the Supreme Court.
Where was the dred Scott case held?
in the Washington D.C. Supreme Court
The US Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision stated that?
After 10 years of appeals in a lower court, the Supreme Court decided that all people of African descent, whether slave or free, could not be US citizens, and hence couldn't sue in federal court. Another ruling outcome of this case was that the federal government had no power to prohibit slavery in its territories.In one of he worst Supreme Court rulings in history, the court decided against Scott, saying that he remained the property of his master, and that free states were obligated to abide by the laws of the slave states.
Did the supreme court declare Scott as a free man?
The US Supreme Court decision on the Dred Scott case resulted in the court making it clear that Scott could not be a free man and denied his case to be free of his slavery status. The Court declared that Scott was not a US citizen, and thus could not sue for his freedom.
What problems might result from the supreme courts ruling in the dred Scott case?
That all black people are banned from this country.
What problems might result from the supreme courts ruling in the dreds Scott case?
That all black people are banned from this country.
What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case?
That Scott had no right to argue in court
What did the supreme court ruling the dred Scott case establish?
The ruling in the Dred Scott case allowed slave owners to take their slaves with them into the Western territories of the United States.
Where was the dred Scott case tried?
It was taken all the way to the Supreme Court, where the Chief Justice issued the controversial decision.
What was the supreme courts ruling in Dred Scott V. Sanford?
The Supreme Court ruled in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered United States citizens and therefore could not file lawsuits in federal court. The court also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and asserted that Congress did not have the authority to prohibit slavery in U.S. territories.
What controversial US Supreme Court ruling held African Americans had no rights and that Congress could not prohibit slavery in the territories?
The verdict in the Dred Scott case - denying the right of a slave to claim his freedom retrospectively, after having lived on free soil but then returned to slave country.
What problems might result from the supreme court's ruling in the Dred Scott court?
That all black people are banned from this country.
What problems might result from the Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott case?
That all black people are banned from this country.
What problems might result from the supreme court ruling in the dred Scott case?
That all black people are banned from this country.
What did the supreme. court rule in the dred Scott case?
The ruling in the Dred Scott case allowed slave owners to take their slaves with them into the Western territories of the United States.
The Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v Sandford 1857 helped to increase sectional conflict because the decision-?
The Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford 1857 worsened sectional conflict by declaring that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not citizens and could not sue in the federal courts. This decision further entrenched divisions between the North and South over the issue of slavery and fed into the growing tensions that eventually led to the Civil War.
