A number of things would have to take place before a long-standing peace (as opposed to a mere cessation of hostilities) could take place. There are other requisites, but there are the most important.
1) Mutual Recognition: Israel would need to recognize a completely independent and sovereign Palestinian Government that would fully control a certain amount of the former British Mandate of Palestine (most likely Gaza and the West Bank). Israel would also have to confer on this state the unambiguous nature of being correct and necessary for Israel. Conversely, Palestine would have to recognize the Right for Israel to Exist as a Jewish State occupying the remaining amount of the British Mandate of Palestine (most likely 1949-Israel). Both sides would have to recognize the historical and emotional value that the land also has to the other.
2) Regional/International Recognition: States that have adopted attitudes strongly favoring one side at the expense of the other, such as the Arab States would need to recognize the legitimacy of both Israel and Palestine.
3) Israeli Reparation Payments: Israel dispossessed many Palestinians of their property, either by malicious activities that took place during the Arab-Israeli Wars or by Ben-Gurion refusing to let Palestinians who left return after the 1948-9 War. Israel needs to pay the Palestinian government reparations for the land that was taken in this way.
4) Israeli Withdrawal from the Settlements: Israel must withdraw from the Settlements to provide Palestine with a viable infrastructure and complete sovereignty. The Settlers must return to Israeli territory. The buildings, however, should be left as partial payment of the above-mentioned reparations.
5) Palestinians Must Concede Right of Return: Recognizing the State of Israel as a Jewish State is meaningless if Palestinians en masse are allowed to Return to Israel. Therefore, Palestinians (and their backers) must abandon the notion that they can ever return to Israeli territory. Palestinians should leave the refugee camps and become proper citizens in this new country of Palestine.
6) Jerusalem Must Be Shared or Internationalized:Palestine and Israel both want Jerusalem and the only way to solve this is either divide the city East/West respectively and divide the Old City or Internationalize the City or some combination of Internationalization and division. Neither side will rest until it can assure its followers that its holy sites will be protected.
7) Liberal Thought: Just in general, people have to be willing to compromise and live with that compromise.
There are numerous particular reasons for the failures of the individual Israeli-Palestinian Accords such as continuing Israeli settlement growth, continuing anti-Zionist education in the Palestinian Territories, a lack of Israeli Military Withdrawal from a lot of territories, a failure of the Palestinian police to crack down on Paramilitary and Terrorist organizations, and so forth.
The bottom line is that while international focus groups and thinktanks have come up with solutions, there are too many people who are too unwilling to compromise to implement them.
US is responsible for no peace as it is helping Jews settle there.
The above answer is fallacious as the aid that goes to Israel does not go towards resettlement. The real difficulty is that both sides have a number of important and difficult concessions to make in pursuit of peace and the majority on each side are not willing to concede as much as they should. See the links to each side's demands.
Answer 1
because the arabvs wanted something different than the israles
Answer 2
In terms of achieving peace in the Arab-Israeli Conflict, a number of obstacles need to be overcome before any long-standing agreement (as opposed to a mere cessation of hostilities) could take place. Without resolving these major issues, peace between Arabs and Israelis will remain elusive. There are other requisites, but there are the most important.
1) Mutual Recognition: Israel would need to recognize a completely independent and sovereign Palestinian Government that would fully control a certain amount of the former British Mandate of Palestine (most likely Gaza and the West Bank). Israel would also have to confer on this state the unambiguous nature of being correct and necessary for Israel. Conversely, Palestine would have to recognize the Right for Israel to Exist as a Jewish State occupying the remaining amount of the British Mandate of Palestine (most likely 1949-Israel). Both sides would have to recognize the historical and emotional value that the land also has to the other.
2) Regional/International Recognition: States that have adopted attitudes strongly favoring one side at the expense of the other, such as the Arab States would need to recognize the legitimacy of both Israel and Palestine.
3) Israeli Reparation Payments: Israel dispossessed many Palestinians of their property, either by malicious activities that took place during the Arab-Israeli Wars or by Ben-Gurion refusing to let Palestinians who left return after the 1948-9 War. Israel needs to pay the Palestinian government reparations for the land that was taken in this way.
4) Israeli Withdrawal from the Settlements:Israel must withdraw from the Settlements to provide Palestine with a viable infrastructure and complete sovereignty. The Settlers must return to Israeli territory. The buildings, however, should be left as partial payment of the above-mentioned reparations.
5) Palestinians Must Concede Right of Return:Recognizing the State of Israel as a Jewish State is meaningless if Palestinians en masse are allowed to Return to Israel. Therefore, Palestinians (and their backers) must abandon the notion that they can ever return to Israeli territory. Palestinians should leave the refugee camps and become proper citizens in this new country of Palestine.
6) Jerusalem Must Be Shared or Internationalized: Palestine and Israel both want Jerusalem and the only way to solve this is either divide the city East/West respectively and divide the Old City or Internationalize the City or some combination of Internationalization and division. Neither side will rest until it can assure its followers that its holy sites will be protected.
7) Liberal Thought: Just in general, people have to be willing to compromise and live with that compromise.
Peace does not mean the total absence of conflict but the capacity to put conflict indicators or conflict situations under control without distablizing the system
no
The opposite of war (conflict) would be peace, or lack of conflict.
He did not let them fart in peace
He brought peace
"If you want peace, prepare for war"
Factors hindering peace include: conflict over resources or territory, political instability, historical grievances or unresolved disputes, lack of effective governance or rule of law, and external interference or support for violent actors. These factors can create tensions and fuel conflict, making it difficult to achieve sustainable peace.
Peace does not mean the total absence of conflict but the capacity to put conflict indicators or conflict situations under control without distablizing the system
It is difficult to measure the percentage of peace in the world as peace is a complex and subjective concept. Global peace indices such as the Global Peace Index provide insight into levels of peace but do not offer a definitive percentage. Peace can vary across regions and is influenced by factors such as conflict, stability, and social harmony.
Peace is always available if people want it; they just have to stop fighting with each other. In the case of the middle east this would seem to require that the various nations and political groups that are currently in conflict should arrive at a peace agreement and then comply with that agreement. Simple in theory, difficult in practice. But many things are changing in the middle east, so who knows what may be possible.
Peace over conflict
The Anatomy of Peace, a book by the Arbinger Institute, was first published in 2006. It explores the role of self-deception in conflict and emphasizes the importance of addressing the root causes of problems to achieve lasting peace.
no
no
"La paz" means "peace" or possibly "the peace" (as in, "the peace between these two countries has been difficult to achieve."). It is sometimes used as a place name, including major cities such as La Paz, Bolivia.
Conflict serves as a contrast to peace, highlighting its value when it is absent. When experiencing conflict, the absence of peace can make individuals realize the importance and appreciate peace more deeply. The theme suggests that it is often through losing peace that its true significance is understood and appreciated.
In the past they have given up their precious land to achieve peace. That has never worked, nor will it ever. No amount of surrendered land will bring peace to this region. Only GOD will bring peace at the end of this age, and nothing man can do will bring this about. All the land they have previously given has only brought more conflict, and weakened Israel. GOD has given them the land, and by giving it away they are in disobedience to HIS will. This will never bring them peace.