why not? war is to out smart the enemy, and out power them. yeah bullets can hurt, but you have to be within shooting distance for that. A nerve agent can kill from thousands of miles away. same reason we would use nukes as a posed to other bombs or missiles. its just the smarter way to do things.
imagine you have to bust into a house with half a dozen enemy solders inside waiting for you. would you just walk in and ask them to put down there guns or would you surprise them with a smoke/irritant grenade then charge in and suppress them?
over all, its the smarter enemy that wins and thats how its always been.
yesANS 2 - NO. biological warfare is a perversion of science and many scientists agree on that.
When biological weapons have been used the outcome has been massive death and biological destruction. It affects all things in the area used. When Hessian used biological weapons against his people whole populations died. Since it is biological it stays in the environment and can mutate so it has been agreed not to use them.
anthrax and botulin toxin
Yes. Smallpox-bearing blankets were distributed by English soldiers to Native Americans during the colonial era. The result was an epidemic.
Aerosols make an awesome weapon. They have been done before using anthrax spores.
A bioagent is a biological agent - a bacterium which can be used as a weapon in biological warfare.
Biological Warfare
Germ warfare. Biological warfare. Bioagents.
Biological warfare.
insect vectors
insect vectors
insect vectors
insect vectors
Yes
A bioweapon is a type of weapon that uses biological agents, such as bacteria, viruses, or toxins, to cause harm or death to humans, animals, or plants. These weapons are designed to be used in warfare to incapacitate or kill the enemy.
John Cookson has written: 'A survey of chemical and biological warfare' -- subject(s): Biological warfare, Chemical warfare 'Using Unix'
Biological Warfare