A historical source can be anything. A letter, diary, painting, newspaper, anything.
No, it's a primary source historical document.
Historians will examine a second hand source of a historical event. If the second hand source matches up to other sources of information, then each source in a certain manner adds to the credibility of the historical event.
Diary...Interview...historical documents
A primary source.
Hehrh
How could you tell if the a Historical source is tainted with bias of a specitic agenda?
Bias is not a secondary source. In terms of historical and academic research and writing, secondary sources are articles and books written by historians and other academics. Secondary sources can be biased based on when the source was written and the author.Ê
Bias in a primary source could manifest in selective omission of important information, exaggeration or understatement of events, or a skewed interpretation of facts to align with the author's perspective or agenda. This can distort the accuracy and reliability of the primary source for historical analysis or research.
Bias in a primary source can lead to distortion or manipulation of information, as the author may have a particular agenda or perspective that influences what they choose to include or exclude. This can result in a skewed representation of events or facts, impacting the overall reliability and objectivity of the primary source for historical or research purposes.
When reading a primary source of historical information, you do not have to watch out for interpretations or analyses from scholars. Since primary sources are firsthand accounts or original documents from the time period being studied, they provide direct evidence of historical events without the filter of interpretation or bias from others.
the decision about what to include and exclude.
# Primary # secondary # secondary # secondary # primary
When analyzing a source
biased :) <3 Apex Answered by the Jarizzle :)
Unintentional bias means the source of the bias is in the data collection or sampling method. Its not done purposefully, but rather ignorantly.
Include and exclude