Want this question answered?
No. An oligarchy is completely against the Enlightenment philosophy.
Pancho Villa hoped that his actions against Americans, particularly the raid on Columbus, New Mexico in 1916, would provoke a larger armed conflict between the United States and his rival, Mexican President Venustiano Carranza. Villa believed that this conflict would bring visibility to his cause and rally support for his revolutionary movement against Carranza. Additionally, he sought to demonstrate his power and force the United States to withdraw its support for Carranza's government.
England and the Netherlands were both Protestant.
For one thing, it won't cause people to rebel against the government, and also makes more people support the government no matter what, which helps in a war.
The Nationalists This group, which had facist tendencies, rebelled against Spain's democratic Republican Government.
No. Due to an almost negligible support from the Mexican government, biofuel cannot compete against gasoline or diesel.
There was substantial support for the War of 1812, and the population was equally divided on the Mexican American War.
antidisestablishmentarianism
Abraham Lincoln spoke out against it when he was a Whig Congressman.
The Federalists were against the Constitution. They wanted their government to be a monarchy -- more like Englands government.
The Mexican government was granting land in Texas to foreign "empresarios" for recruiting settlers and taking responsibility for them. The most famous of the empresarios was Stephen F. Austin, who got 300 families to immigrate to Texas from the United States and after whom the Texas state capital is named.
Taxes go up to support the government
No. An oligarchy is completely against the Enlightenment philosophy.
Slavery and participation in the Mexican-American War.
I'm not sure. But just for the record, I love your question! If I were a celebrity, I would be, too. My favorite part of the question is how you said "Mexican" instead of just horse slaughter. I am against Mexican horse slaughter, but I support humane slaughter in the US. So I call myself a slaughter-supporter, because I support horse slaughter here in the US. Sorry if this didn't help. Thanks, Jaybrianna.
No,but you must show you have enough income to support him should he become sick and unable to work.So he does not become a burden on the government.
Thoreau went to jail for refusing to pay taxes as a form of protest against the Mexican-American War and the institution of slavery. He believed that by going to jail, he was standing up for his principles and refusing to support a government that he believed was unjust.