Franklin Delano Roosevelt's 'Cash and Carry' policy allowed for the sale of materials to belligerents only if they agreed to come and pick it up, accepting any and all risks. Some Americans objected because they believed the policy could somehow lead them into war.
the word "Indian" refers to people who are not native Americans
toothpick
[object Object]
For exactly the same reason many Americans would object to renaming the President of the United States the King of the United States. They would object even though the President/king holds more power than most actual kings in the world, and that American people are happy to see that power pass from one President/king to his son, no matter how incompetent (George I and George II anyone?). For historical reasons they don't like the title King.
The Liberals.
him= direct object president= objective complement
Any noun can function as an indirect object. A noun is used as the subject of a sentence or a clause, and as the object of a verb or a preposition. Example sentence for the noun 'president' as indirect object: The minister brought the president some bad news. (the direct object is 'news', the indirect object is 'president')
the word "Indian" refers to people who are not native Americans
toothpick
The toothpick
[object Object]
Americans = noun - subject few = adjective - it modifies the subject. speak = verb fluent = adjective - it modifies the object. French = noun - object
Chewing gum
Marv albert
The Native American that were on the Trail of Tears were being pushed westward by the Americans although the Native Americans did not fight back or declare war on the trail one can see that the Americans removing the native of the land can be said to be there enemies ...
The president will give a speech is active.The speech will be given by the president is passive.The passive voice is formed with a form of "to be" (be, in this case) and a past participle (given). Note that the object (the speech) is put in the subject position, and the subject (the president) is put in the object position.
For exactly the same reason many Americans would object to renaming the President of the United States the King of the United States. They would object even though the President/king holds more power than most actual kings in the world, and that American people are happy to see that power pass from one President/king to his son, no matter how incompetent (George I and George II anyone?). For historical reasons they don't like the title King.