0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When a civil rights law was challenged after the Civil War the Supreme Court ruled what?
in favor of discimination against African Americans because it was not slavery.
What were most of the slaves in Egypt?
When King Thutmose the 2 ruled he enslaved many people from Nubia.
What African country was ruled by apartheid until 1994?
South Africa
What did the dred Scott case say about enslaved people?
Nothing very flattering - from either side. Scott had had his opportinity to claim freedom when he was in the Northern states, but he didn't do it. He then tried to claim it later, on a retrospective basis, and the local judges had not dealt with this kind of case before. It was referred to the Supreme Court, which declared that a black man was not the sort of persion who should be suing a white man.
The enslaved people of Egypt revolted and drove out the Kushite kings?
The statement you provided is inaccurate. The Kushite kings ruled over Egypt during the 25th Dynasty, which is also known as the Kushite Dynasty. They were not enslaved people but rather rulers from the Kingdom of Kush in Nubia (present-day Sudan). The Kushite kings were eventually overthrown by the Assyrians, not by enslaved people.
Why is Dred Scott not a citizen?
The Supreme Court ruled in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered citizens of the United States. The decision was based on the belief that African Americans could not be citizens under the Constitution because they were not considered equal to white citizens.
What case determined that African-Americans slaves were not citizens?
The Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857 determined that African-American slaves were not U.S. citizens. The Supreme Court ruled that African-Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered citizens and therefore did not have legal standing to sue in federal court.
How did the fugitive slave act and the deed Scott decision affect formerly enslaved African Americans living in the north?
The Fugitive Slave Act mandated the return of escaped slaves to their owners, making it risky for formerly enslaved African Americans living in the north as they could be captured and forced back into slavery. The Dred Scott decision ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not U.S. citizens, which undermined their legal rights and protections. These laws increased fear and discrimination among the African American community in the north and pushed them to fight for abolition and equality.
What political stand did Dred Scott take answer?
Dred Scott was an enslaved African American man who went to court to sue for his freedom. The court case, known as Dred Scott v. Sandford, ultimately ruled against him and declared that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered American citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court.
Which cases determined that African-American slaves were not citizens?
The two key cases were Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) and Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842). In the Dred Scott case, the Supreme Court ruled that African-Americans, whether free or enslaved, could not be considered citizens of the United States. In Prigg v. Pennsylvania, the Court held that states were not required to protect the rights of fugitive slaves, reaffirming the exclusion of African-Americans from citizenship.
What is the significance of the dred Scott decision on the issue of slavery?
The Dred Scott decision of 1857 ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered citizens and therefore could not file lawsuits in federal court. This decision further entrenched the institution of slavery by denying African Americans legal rights and protections, and contributed to the tensions leading up to the American Civil War.
Breakdown of the spartan population?
Approximately 8,000 Spartiates (adult male citizens) ruled over a population of 100,000 enslaved and semi-enslaved people.
How did the supreme court use the constitution to uphold slavery?
The Supreme Court upheld slavery through decisions like the 1857 Dred Scott v. Sandford case, which ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not American citizens and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court. This decision allowed for the expansion of slavery into US territories and reinforced the idea that African Americans were considered property under the Constitution.
Who was the first group to ruled Mexico?
The answer is the African-Americans
How did the abolitionists react to the supreme courts decision in the Dred Scott case?
Abolitionists were outraged by the Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case, as it ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not citizens and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court. They saw this decision as a setback to the abolitionist movement and a reinforcement of the institution of slavery.
What was the result of the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision?
The Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision in 1857 ruled that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered citizens and had no right to sue in federal court. The decision also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and stated that the federal government could not regulate slavery in the territories.
What 2 statements are true about the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on Dred Scott?
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case declared that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, could not be U.S. citizens. It also ruled that the federal government did not have the authority to prohibit slavery in U.S. territories, invalidating the Missouri Compromise.
