It entirely depends on how you define "strength".
The Israeli Army is certainly much better armed than Hezbollah and while Israel has invaded Lebanon in ground invasions, Hezbollah has never attempted a ground invasion of Israel. Hezbollah has no army that could contest Israel in traditional international combat (such as was seen during World War II for example). However, Hezbollah's effectiveness lies in its ability to blend into local areas and put its men into locations not easily discoverable to Israeli soldiers. This was why the 2006 Hezbollah-Israel War has usually been seen as a stalemate or slight Hezbollah victory even though all fighting occurred in Lebanon and Hezbollah incurred many more casualties; Israel was not able to remove Hezbollah from Lebanon as it had previously been able to remove the PLO from Lebanon in 1982.
However, to me, strength is about the idea to form a society where people desire peace and love in their lives even when their neighbors try to act divisively. In this way, Israel is clearly stronger. Regardless of any particular Israeli government, the leadership of the Israeli Army is disinclined from international conflict and openly differs to a civilian government that wants long-term peace (whose conditions vary with the politics of the day). Hezbollah has made clear that they are wholly disinterested in any peace or settlement, saying in their organizational charter that even if all of the Islamic countries made peace with Israel (including a future Palestine), they would continue to fight to oppose Israel.
In the Israel-Hezbollah war in 2006, Israel was unable to eliminate Hezbollah nor their weapon stock, and Hezbollah was unable to protect the Lebanese villages from destruction. They both failed to reach their goals, but they both believed they won. The ones who lost are the peaceful Lebanese citizens, and the destruction of their infrastructure, while harming the tourist season and economy.
Lebanon.It is important to note that the invasion in 1982 was to pursue the PLO, not Hezbollah.
Answer 1Yes, they can as they have many allies throughout the middle east and Israel does not know where the headquarters are.Answer 2There are two parts to that question: 1) Can Hezbollah breach Israel's borders? and 2) If they can do this, can they sustain this breach?1) Yes. Hezbollah proved that it can breach Israeli defenses when they kidnapped the Israeli soldiers Regev and Goldwasser. This, however, was a coordinated attack with months of planning as opposed to a morning jaunt. Hezbollah needs to use a concerted effort to breach Israeli defenses.2) No. Hezbollah showed in the 2006 Israeli-Hezbollah War, that Hezbollah is an insurgent fighting group. Such a group can only fight a defensive war, not an offensive one that requires occupation of hostile territory. Hezbollah requires loyal allies to live in the territory to be invaded. Israelis (whether Jewish or Arab) have no love of Hezbollah and this would require the army to fight out in the open where the Israeli army is much more effective. It is telling that during the 2006 Israeli-Hezbollah War that the only attacks perpetrated within Israeli borders were missile attacks as opposed to military raids or direct combat. As concerns Hezbollah's allies, Iran, for all of its bluster, is not willing to expend military troops to bolster the regime of Bashar al-Assad (a regime it still financially backs) while Syria is in the midst of a civil war that Iran could effectively end. How much less is Iran interested in assisting an invasion of a country that has a far stronger military capability and where it has no internal allies.
Answer 1Once went and defeated and requested cease fire from Hezbollah. so this is a good lesson.Answer 2Israel will defend its citizens and its homeland as necessary. Hezbollah certainly hasthe ability to provoke a substantial response, but should understand that there will beno whining about whether or not they feel the response is 'proportionate'.
Hezbollah has published three main documents that list its objectives. In 1985, Hezbollah published a Manifesto which outlined its objectives. First, Hezbollah sought to expel the United States, France, and their allies from Lebanon. Second, Hezbollah sought to bring all Lebanese who perpetrated crimes against Muslims and Christians to justice. Third, Hezbollah called for a popularly elected representative form of government, preferably Islamic. Fourth, Hezbollah called for Israel's destruction.1 In 2009, Hezbollah published a second Manifesto, which outlined new objectives but did not retract the old Manifesto. First, Hezbollah renewed its call for a representative political system. Second, Hezbollah renewed its call for resistance against Israel, but stopped short of demanding its destruction. Third, Hezbollah called for better relations with Arab states. Fourth, Hezbollah called on the Arab world to recognize Iran as the leader of the Muslim world.2 Finally, in 2010, Naim Qassem, Hezbollah's Deputy Secretary General published a lengthy book outlining the organization's objectives. The book supported both the 1985 and 2010 manifesto and added some new objectives. First, resist Israel. Second, provide social services for Lebanon. Third, assist the Palestinian's resistance movement against Israel. Fourth, create a representative form of government. Fifth, create unity with Lebanese Christians and other religious sects.3 From these three documents, one can readily see that Hezbollah's highest priorities are to defeat Israel and create a representative government. Hezbollah continues to increase its military strength but it remains inferior to Israel's powerful military. During the 2006 War, however, Hezbollah did demonstrate that it could challenge Israel's military and inflict substantial causalities.4 Hezbollah also continues to gain political power in the Lebanese Parliament and now controls the cabinet. Nonetheless, Lebanon is bitterly divided amongst religions and a truly representative government that divides power fairly between Muslims and Christians remains in the distant future. 1. "An Open Letter: The Hizbollah Program," The Jerusalem Quarterly 48 (1988). 2. "Hezbollah's New Political Document," Syrian News Station (November 11, 2009). 3. Naim Qassem, Hizbullah: The Story From Within, (2010), these objectives are scattered throughout the book. 4. Shai Feldman, "The 2006 War: A Preliminary Assessment," Crown Center for Middle East Studies 10 (2006).
There were NO Hezbollah called Israeli soldiers. -Hezbollah is a terrorist group opposing Israel.
Yes and Hezbollah won and Israel asked for cease fire from Hazbollah.
They are against the Jewish settlement in Israel
Hezbollah was a primary organiser of terrorist acts and bombings mostly against Israel, but also the US and other countries.
They are against the Jewish settlement in Israel
In the Israel-Hezbollah war in 2006, Israel was unable to eliminate Hezbollah nor their weapon stock, and Hezbollah was unable to protect the Lebanese villages from destruction. They both failed to reach their goals, but they both believed they won. The ones who lost are the peaceful Lebanese citizens, and the destruction of their infrastructure, while harming the tourist season and economy.
There are a few countries that consider Hezbollah to be a terrorist organization. Jerusalem, Israel, Pakistan, Syria, and Pakistan are a few countries that deal with Hezbollah.
Lebanon.It is important to note that the invasion in 1982 was to pursue the PLO, not Hezbollah.
Hezbollah and the Syrian regime have a lot in common with each other. The Syrian regime is run by Shiites just like Hezbollah. The Syrian regime hates Israel and America just like Hezbollah. All these common factors makes the Syrian regime to support Hezbollah.
The USA never engaged Hezbollah militarily. It has only had proxy wars with the organization through Israel and the United Nations.
The Lebanese Military is generally wary of Hezbollah, primarily because Hezbollah is stronger than the Lebanese Military and Hezbollah takes its marching orders from Assad's Syria and Iran, not the Lebanese people, which means that Hezbollah could act in contravention to Lebanese welfare.
Most true liberals do not support Israel, as they listen and consider propaganda from the lying mouths of terrorist organizations such as Hamas and Hezbollah.