Both Matthew and Luke provide genealogies back through Jesus' earthly father Joseph, showing that Zorobabel, son of Salathiel, and King David were legal ancestors of Jesus. Zorobabel was the great leader who led the Jews back from the Babylonian Exile, so descent from him would have been a sign of greatness. While Luke says that the father of Salathiel was called Neri, Matthew says that the father of Salathiel was called Jechonias. Jews also believed that the hoped-for messiah would be descended from David.
Matthew goes further than Luke, having Jesus and Zorobabel descended from David through the line of Judahite kings, while Luke has them descended from David through a line of commoners. Both mention the legendary patriarch, Abraham.
Except for the one-phrase mention in "The Devil and Daniel Webster", there is no historical record of him. Even the Encyclopedia Britannica doesn't mention him. Nobody online has even bothered to make up any kind of fictional biography of him other than to say "HE WAS A REVEREND." As far as we can tell from the research, he didn't exist.
Buckhurst Hill is located is Essex, England. It is a suburban town located in the Epping Forest district. It is on the northern boundary of Greater London. 1135 is the first historical mention of Buckhurst Hill.
There is no specific description available for the weight that hit Harriet Tubman in the head. Historical records mention that she was hit by a heavy metal weight thrown by an enraged overseer, but further details regarding its appearance are not provided.
Appearently the Columbus/UFO story is just that, a story. There is mention of a UFO in Columbus's log book.
There's not a specific 'most famous' monument, like the french with their Eiffel Tower for instance. The most important, though, is certainly Mosteiro da Batalha, due to its extraordinary and at the time seemingly impossible architecture, not to mention the historical importance that it has to the nation. It's a UNESCO World Heritage building, also.
The mother of St. Matthew is not specifically named in the Bible or other historical accounts.
There is no record or historical evidence to confirm whether Saint Matthew had any children. The Bible does not mention any descendants of Saint Matthew.
Matthew 10:29 and Matthew 10:31.
If Matthew had any illnesses, there is no mention of them in scripture nor in tradition.
I don't believe the word 'lamb' is used in Matthew's Gospel.
they first mention his name in the book of Matthew
In the genealogy of Jesus which is in Matthew 1.
Only Matthew's gospel mentions the Magi.
The nativity accounts in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke are entirely different from each other, and John Shelby Spong (Born of a Woman: A Bishop Rethinks the Birth of Jesus), says that neither of the nativity stories contains any historical truth. Matthew's Gospel was written before that of Luke, so its author could have known nothing of what would be written in Luke as few years later.
Matthew 27Mark 15 Luke 23 John 18
A historical allusion is a reference, usually in literature, to actual events of the past. For example, the popular movie Forrest Gump made several historical allusions to events such as the Vietnam war.
In Matthew, there is no specific mention of the daughters of Jerusalem repenting. However, they are seen mourning while Jesus is on his way to his crucifixion.