In September of 1951, Martin Luther King began doctoral studies in Systematic Theology at Boston University. He also studied at Harvard University. His dissertation, "A Comparison of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Henry Wieman," was completed in 1955, and the Ph.D. degree from Boston, a Doctorate of Philosophy in Systematic Theology, was awarded on June 5, 1955.
During the 1980s, archivists associated with The Martin Luther King Papers Project
uncovered evidence that the dissertation King prepared for his Ph.D. in theology from
Boston University, "A Comparison of the Conception of God in the Thinking of Paul
Tillich and Henry Nelson Wieman," was plagiarized, and the story broke in the national
media in 1990. King included in his dissertation a good deal of material taken verbatim
from a variety of other sources without proper attribution (or any attribution at all),
an act which constitutes plagiarism by any reasonable academic standard.
The Martin Luther King Papers Project addressed the issue in Volume II of The Papers
of Martin Luther King, Jr. (and reproduced a statement thereform in the FAQ on their
web site):
The readers of King's dissertation, L. Harold DeWolf and S. Paul Schilling, a
1/10/2011 snopes.com: Four Things You Didn't Kn…
snopes.com/history/…/mlking.asp 2/8
professor of systematic theology who had recently arrived at Boston
University, failed to notice King's problematic use of sources. After reading a
draft of the dissertation, DeWolf criticized him for failing to make explicit
"presuppositions and norms employed in the critical evaluation," but his
comments were largely positive. He commended King for his handling of a
"difficult" topic "with broad learning, impressive ability and convincing
mastery of the works immediately involved." Schilling found two problems
with King's citation practices while reading the draft, but dismissed these as
anomalous and praised the dissertation in his Second Reader's report ...
As was true of King's other academic papers, the plagiaries in his
dissertation escaped detection in his lifetime. His professors at Boston, like
those at Crozer, saw King as an earnest and even gifted student who
presented consistent, though evolving, theological identity in his essays,
exams and classroom comments ... Although the extent of King's plagiaries
suggest he knew that he was at least skirting academic norms, the extant
documents offer no direct evidence in this matter. Thus he may have simply
become convinced, on the basis of his grades at Crozer and Boston, that his
papers were sufficiently competent to withstand critical scrutiny. Moreover,
King's actions during his early adulthood indicate that he increasingly saw
himself as a preacher appropriating theological scholarship rather than as an
academic producing such scholarship ...
In 1991 a Boston University investigatory committee concluded that King had
plagiarized portions of his doctoral dissertation but did not recommend the revocation
of his degree:
A committee of scholars at Boston University concluded yesterday that Rev.
Martin Luther King Jr. plagiarized portions of his doctoral dissertation,
completed there in the 1950s.
BU provost Jon Westling accepted the panel's recommendation that a letter
be attached to King's dissertation in the university library, noting that
numerous passages lacked appropriate quotations and citations of sources.
The letter was placed in the archives yesterday afternoon, a BU spokesman
said.
Westling also accepted the committee's statement that "no thought should
be given to the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree from Boston
University" and the assertion that despite its flaws, the dissertation "makes
an intelligent contribution to scholarship."
The investigatory committee, comprising three professors in the BU School
of Theology and one from American University, was appointed by Westling
last November after researchers at Stanford said they had discovered
numerous instances of plagiarism in King's work as a graduate student.
While there was general agreement that King acted improperly, Clayborne
Carson, head of the King Papers Project at Stanford where the plagiarism
initially was uncovered, noted that King made no effort to conceal what he
was doing, providing grounds for a belief that King was not willfully engaged
in wrongdoing.
Westling said in a prepared statement yesterday that it was "impractical to
reach, on the available evidence, any conclusions about Dr. King's reasons
for failing to attribute some, but not all, of his sources. The committee's
findings, although important from the point of view of historical accuracy, do
not affect Dr. King's greatness, not do they change the fact that Dr. King
made an unequalled contribution to the cause of justice and equal rights in
this nation."
John H. Cartwright, a member of the committee and Martin Luther King Jr.
Professor of Social Ethics at BU, said the committee had examined King's
dissertation independently of the King Papers Project and "we did find
serious improprieties."
1/10/2011 snopes.com: Four Things You Didn't Kn…
snopes.com/history/…/mlking.asp 3/8
The chair Cartwright occupies was created by the Boston University
trustees after King's assassination. Cartwright was entering BU as a
seminary student when King was finishing his doctorate.
"We had many of the same professors, we worked in the same atmosphere
during our graduate studies," Cartwright said, and "under no circumstances
would the atmosphere under which he did his work condone what Dr. King
did. It's incredible. He was not unaware of the correct procedure. This
wasn't just done out of ignorance."
The committee found that King "is responsible for knowingly misappropriating
the borrowed materials that he failed to cite or to cite adequately." It found
a pattern of appropriation of uncited material "that is a straightforward
breach of academic norms and that constitutes plagiarism as commonly
understood."
The letter to be attached to King's dissertation, Cartwright pointed out,
"indicates there are serious improprieties and points readers to sources
where they can find chapter and verse."
The committee found no grounds for charges raised last year that King drew
his organization and chapter headings from another person's dissertation.
The plagiarism, the panel said, was of passages from the works of
philosophers whose concepts of God King was comparing in his work. The
dissertation is titled "A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking
of Paul Tillich and Henry Nelson Wieman."
The committee also found no evidence that the professors reviewing King's
dissertation had a double standard for African-American students and
examined their work less critically than the work of whites. "Standards were
applied with equal strictness to black as well as to white students," the
panel concluded. "Black as well as white students failed out of the program."
Even though faculty supervision of King's work "failed to detect the large
number of uncited borrowings that breached academic norms," the
committee also found, the examining professors were not negligent
"according to normal standards of supervision."
*Snopes
In 1948, Martin graduated from Morehouse with a Bachelor of Arts degree in sociology. He was enrolled in Morehouse College at age 15!
Also he was enrolled in Crozer Theological Seminary in Chester, Pennsylvania which he graduated with a Bachelor of Divinitydegree in 1951.
Later on he began doctoral studies in systematic theology at Boston University and received his Doctor of Philosophydegree, on June 5, 1955.
martin Luther king dad name was Damien
Martin Luther King Jr was not named after Martin Luther. Martin Luther King Jr was named after his father, Martin Luther King. Martin Luther King was named after Martin Luther.
Dr. Martin Luther King attended Morehouse College and Boston University. Dr. King received a degree in Sociology from Morehouse College.
MLK went to morehouse college and afterwords he did doctoral studies at Boston University.
Sociology
Because he was awarded an honorary doctorate degree.
Martin Luther King Jr. got his doctorate degree from Harvard.
1948
in new york
The first degree Martin Luther King, Jr. received was a Bachelor's of Arts in Sociology from Morehouse College in Atlanta, Georgia in 1948.
The father of Martin Luther King, Jr. was Martin Luther King, Sr.
Martin Luther King graduated from Morehouse College in 1948 with a Bachelor of the Arts degree in sociology.
Nothing, he got a doctor's degree, so people started calling him "Dr." Martin Luther King. :)
1955
He recieved a doctorate degree.
Ph.D
1955