I believe this would be referred to as a division of power and a checks and balances system.
State rights!
because our gov didnt want one total control branch. so they set up the checks and balances system The framers of the Constitution had an awareness that concentrated that power was dangerous; and expected each branch of government ( Legislative, Executive, Judicial) would try to expand their powers, thus the Consititution it's self would block each other's overly ambitious actions, hence Checks and Balances- where each of the 3 branches have the power to limit the actions of each other. They check and balance each other out.
They were afraid of any system of government in which a person, or a small group of people could make the rules and take over. They wanted a strong central government in which the powers would not be so strong as to take away the rights of states or individuals. To keep a small group or an individual from taking those steps they adopted a system of checks and balances they felt would prevent that.
it separated the government into three branches (legislative, judicial, and executive) so no one part or individual would have all the power.
Separation of powers and the system of checks and balances
It would disrupt the checks and balances of the government's branches
Checks and balances was created so no branch of government would become to powerful.
They wanted all of them equal, and they did that with a system of checks and balances
The president would nominate judges, but the senate hasn’t to approve them
The president would nominate judges, but the senate hasn’t to approve them
The president would nominate judges, but the senate hasn’t to approve them
Checks and balances is used to by the three branches to check on each other.
If I knew, don't you think I would tell you? Ha. Right. I wouldn't. But,... America has checks and balances. That is not all but you don't need to know
That would be checks and balances.
to make sure that every citizen would have the same freedomns
The President would nominate judges, but the Senate has to approve them. (Nova Net)