answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

If there was no system of checks and balances, one part of the government would have all of the power. This becomes dangerous for the citizens because they are ruled by a single power.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What would happen if there was no system of checks and balances?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

What is the term for dividing the powers of the federal government into three branches?

I believe this would be referred to as a division of power and a checks and balances system.


Supporters of the Constitution believed that the checks and balances system would allow a strong central government and still preserve the rights of the?

State rights!


Why do the branches have checks on other branches?

because our gov didnt want one total control branch. so they set up the checks and balances system The framers of the Constitution had an awareness that concentrated that power was dangerous; and expected each branch of government ( Legislative, Executive, Judicial) would try to expand their powers, thus the Consititution it's self would block each other's overly ambitious actions, hence Checks and Balances- where each of the 3 branches have the power to limit the actions of each other. They check and balance each other out.


Why did the Founding Fathers believe that a division of powers and a system of 'Checks and Balances' was nessacery in the Constitution?

They were afraid of any system of government in which a person, or a small group of people could make the rules and take over. They wanted a strong central government in which the powers would not be so strong as to take away the rights of states or individuals. To keep a small group or an individual from taking those steps they adopted a system of checks and balances they felt would prevent that.


How did the concept of checks and balances work?

it separated the government into three branches (legislative, judicial, and executive) so no one part or individual would have all the power.

Related questions

The framers believed that would be weakened if congress was responsible for choosing the president?

Separation of powers and the system of checks and balances


What did critics say would be a result of Roosevelt's court packing plan?

It would disrupt the checks and balances of the government's branches


Why is checks and balances important?

Checks and balances was created so no branch of government would become to powerful.


Which branch did the founding fathers hoped would be stronger?

They wanted all of them equal, and they did that with a system of checks and balances


Is an example of the Constitution system of checks and balances?

The president would nominate judges, but the senate hasn’t to approve them


Is an example of the constitution's system of checks and balances?

The president would nominate judges, but the senate hasn’t to approve them


Is an example of constitution's system of checks and balances?

The president would nominate judges, but the senate hasn’t to approve them


How would you use Checks and Balances in a sentence?

Checks and balances is used to by the three branches to check on each other.


What are countries that do not use the system of checks and balances?

If I knew, don't you think I would tell you? Ha. Right. I wouldn't. But,... America has checks and balances. That is not all but you don't need to know


The system outlined within the constitution to prevent an abuse of power by any governing body is called?

That would be checks and balances.


Did the writers of the Constitution include a system of checks and balances in the government?

to make sure that every citizen would have the same freedomns


Which of the following is an example of the constitution's system of checks and balances?

The President would nominate judges, but the Senate has to approve them. (Nova Net)