there wasn't one
EDIT:
Instead of a jury, the Court of Oyer and Terminer had a panel of judges that included William Stoughton, Thomas Danforth, John Hathorne, Bartholomew Gedney, Samuel Sewall and George Herrick. Nathaniel Saltonstall had been one of the original members but resigned after spectral evidence was accepted. He was replaced by Jonathon Corwin.
Obviously, the Salem Witch Trials tried a very different crime. But, other than that, the Salem Trials were very much like a normal civil trial today.
The Salem Witch Trials are known for all the false accusations and multiple deaths. A lot of the accusations were caused by young girls, like Abigail Williams, were false and they killed many people--men and women.
They begin in the winter of 1692 when girls in Salem begun having epilepsy-like fits that were attributed to witchcraft.
I like this question, if only because it proves my point that the Crucible has corrupted the public knowledge of the Salem trials. Ruth Putnam is a creation of Arthur Miller for his play. I figure that Ruth is actually Ann Putnam the younger and Miller renamed her to lessen the confusion of having two Ann Putnams, mother and daughter, in the dialogue.
they were almost exclusively innocent people who were accused for ulterior reasons. There was a preacher named Cotton Mather who was enthusiastic about the Salem witch trials. If a person were accused, Mather would have her thrown into a body of water. If she drowned, he said that meant she was indeed a witch. If she did not drown, he said that was evidence that she was a witch since few women could swim at that time.
no
Obviously, the Salem Witch Trials tried a very different crime. But, other than that, the Salem Trials were very much like a normal civil trial today.
Like all of the accusing girls of Salem, Betty's life after the trials fades into the unknown.
The Salem Witch Trials are known for all the false accusations and multiple deaths. A lot of the accusations were caused by young girls, like Abigail Williams, were false and they killed many people--men and women.
They begin in the winter of 1692 when girls in Salem begun having epilepsy-like fits that were attributed to witchcraft.
There were no actual witches in Salem during the trials. Witchcraft was seem as wrong because they thought it was the work of the devil. They thought witches killed crops, sunk ships and murdered people. That's what "witch" meant to the people in Salem. Now, it refers to Wiccans, pagans and the like. Hope that helps. Your question was very hard to understand.
Both events were characterized by mass hysteria and paranoia, leading to widespread accusations and fear. Both the Salem Witch Trials and the Red Scare involved baseless accusations and led to the unjust persecution of innocent people. In both cases, there was a climate of suspicion and intolerance that allowed for the quick spread of accusations and little opportunity for defense or due process.
Afflicted girls would accuse them. They would say things like "She's hurting me! She's pinching me!"
Some, like the courthouse, are still in existance. Most, however, have been lost to time and renovations in the town.
yes it does because it is based on the Salem witch trials the characters like John Proctor were real and were persecuted
Because the author, Arthur Miller, went through a similar, but more modern ersion of the Salem witch trials, the McCarthy Witch trials, where they tries communists instead of witches. Like Proctor, Miller refused to betray himself and insisted on his innocence
Yes. People accused later in the trials were not jailed when accused because people didn't believe the accusations as quickly. Some, like John Alden, left Salem before they could be sent to prison.