Overall it brought the US actively into the war. As a more direct response, the US launched the Doolittle Raid. Sixteen B-25 land based bombers that were modified for carrier operations were launched in April 1942 to bomb Japan. While this didn't inflict significant loses on the Japanese military, it did negatively affect the moral of the civilian population of Japan.
AnswerPeal Harbor was not a battle but an attack. The Japanese claim they tried to send the message but the translators could not decode it and send it to America on time. They told us 3 hours too late. So you can say they won the battle but we won the war. It was not easy but we did it and made it look easy. AnswerThere was not a very big battle, but if you were to choose a winner, it would be the Japanese pilots, although the American solders did fight honorably. Pearl HarborThe event at Pearl Harbor is not considered a battle. It was an unexpected massacre. An unfortunate event proposed by enemy forces. A despicable act of severe proportion but, still not a battle. In addition, the retaliation of the US armed forces (nuclear weaponry of WWII) was not a battle either. Hypothetically, it could be a battle; simply because it was a mass death from an unnatural cause. Most other related situations of that extent are battles. Similar to the morning of Sept.11th you wouldn't consider that a battle, would you? In the same, December 7th was an attack that don't have an opportunity to fight back immediately. In that case, it's not a battle. No one literally won at Pearl Harbor. But in both cases (Dec. 7 and Sept. 11), the US had not struck back at that exact point in time However, give the US a quick moment, and we have always fought back. We won WWII and we have the upper hand of this war as well!Pearl HarborPearl Harbor wasn't really a "battle," per See Rather, it was a sneak attack which resulted in the deaths of over 3000 Americans and a very few Japanese. To the extent that the attack provided the impetus for America to formally declare war on Japan (and the axis powers), the attack on Pearl Harbor might be characterized as having ultimately led to the defeat of Japan, but the attack itself was generally viewed as a success. The one major failure of the attack was the inability of the Japanese planes to find and destroy the fuel reserves of the Pacific Fleet. This "oversight" allowed America to quickly rebuild the fleet and prosecute the war in the Pacific. AnswerTechnically nobody "won", as it was not a war, it was an attack. But I think I understand what you are asking, and in that case, Japan won. AnswerNo one really won, but if you look at it very closely the Japanese won. The reason why I a saying this is because all of the damage was done on the Pearl Harbor. there was no damage over there in Japan. AnswerNobody really won the battle at Pearl Harbor, but if you really have to pick a "winner" there, it would probably be the Japanese. They destroyed many ships and killed over a thousand military personal along with some 64 civilians. AnswerIt was war. There is never a winner. Some country just loses less! AnswerThe Japanese won. Their aircraft bombed, torpedoed and shot up ships and other military targets. And the did so when the military stationed there least expected it. AnswerThere was no winner. it was the Japanese surprise attack trying to destory our aircraft carriers, so technically no one succeeded because the Japanese failed to destroy our aircraft cariiers AnswerThere really were no winners. The U.S. aircraft carriers were out to sea. Although damage was done, it didn't put the U.S. out of action. And as a Japanese Commander later said, "We have woken a sleeping Dragon." That they did because the U.S. forces beat their way across the Pacific and dropped the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki ending the conflict.America, that is when the poem "The Star Spangled Banner" was written No. My history teacher told me it was the Japanese that won.
The NBA record for consecutive losses in a season is 23 held by the 1996 Vancouver Grizzlies.
13,000 Union loses 5,000 CSA loses in total 18000
During the Battle of the Mississinewa (1812) the US fought the Miami tribe of Native Americans. During the battle, 38 members of the Miami tribe were killed and 42 were captured. The US saw loses too, 12 killed and 46 wounded.
No, it loses all Attack Points.
Yes. They will be as sneaky as Pearl Harbor. It will be carried out in full secrecy while maintaining friendship with the U.S. The right time for them to attack is when U.S. loses its grip in Asia.
Overall it brought the US actively into the war. As a more direct response, the US launched the Doolittle Raid. Sixteen B-25 land based bombers that were modified for carrier operations were launched in April 1942 to bomb Japan. While this didn't inflict significant loses on the Japanese military, it did negatively affect the moral of the civilian population of Japan.
AnswerPeal Harbor was not a battle but an attack. The Japanese claim they tried to send the message but the translators could not decode it and send it to America on time. They told us 3 hours too late. So you can say they won the battle but we won the war. It was not easy but we did it and made it look easy. AnswerThere was not a very big battle, but if you were to choose a winner, it would be the Japanese pilots, although the American solders did fight honorably. Pearl HarborThe event at Pearl Harbor is not considered a battle. It was an unexpected massacre. An unfortunate event proposed by enemy forces. A despicable act of severe proportion but, still not a battle. In addition, the retaliation of the US armed forces (nuclear weaponry of WWII) was not a battle either. Hypothetically, it could be a battle; simply because it was a mass death from an unnatural cause. Most other related situations of that extent are battles. Similar to the morning of Sept.11th you wouldn't consider that a battle, would you? In the same, December 7th was an attack that don't have an opportunity to fight back immediately. In that case, it's not a battle. No one literally won at Pearl Harbor. But in both cases (Dec. 7 and Sept. 11), the US had not struck back at that exact point in time However, give the US a quick moment, and we have always fought back. We won WWII and we have the upper hand of this war as well!Pearl HarborPearl Harbor wasn't really a "battle," per See Rather, it was a sneak attack which resulted in the deaths of over 3000 Americans and a very few Japanese. To the extent that the attack provided the impetus for America to formally declare war on Japan (and the axis powers), the attack on Pearl Harbor might be characterized as having ultimately led to the defeat of Japan, but the attack itself was generally viewed as a success. The one major failure of the attack was the inability of the Japanese planes to find and destroy the fuel reserves of the Pacific Fleet. This "oversight" allowed America to quickly rebuild the fleet and prosecute the war in the Pacific. AnswerTechnically nobody "won", as it was not a war, it was an attack. But I think I understand what you are asking, and in that case, Japan won. AnswerNo one really won, but if you look at it very closely the Japanese won. The reason why I a saying this is because all of the damage was done on the Pearl Harbor. there was no damage over there in Japan. AnswerNobody really won the battle at Pearl Harbor, but if you really have to pick a "winner" there, it would probably be the Japanese. They destroyed many ships and killed over a thousand military personal along with some 64 civilians. AnswerIt was war. There is never a winner. Some country just loses less! AnswerThe Japanese won. Their aircraft bombed, torpedoed and shot up ships and other military targets. And the did so when the military stationed there least expected it. AnswerThere was no winner. it was the Japanese surprise attack trying to destory our aircraft carriers, so technically no one succeeded because the Japanese failed to destroy our aircraft cariiers AnswerThere really were no winners. The U.S. aircraft carriers were out to sea. Although damage was done, it didn't put the U.S. out of action. And as a Japanese Commander later said, "We have woken a sleeping Dragon." That they did because the U.S. forces beat their way across the Pacific and dropped the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki ending the conflict.America, that is when the poem "The Star Spangled Banner" was written No. My history teacher told me it was the Japanese that won.
A substance loses energy during cooling and evaporation processes. During cooling, heat is transferred away from the substance, lowering its temperature. During evaporation, the substance loses energy as molecules escape from its surface, causing it to undergo a phase change from liquid to gas.
Midway, being, has never held much strategic importance to anyone. It happened in 1942 to be where some hundreds of US servicemen were posted, along with a couple dozen airplanes. At that time, the Japanese were spoiling for a fight -- THE fight, the one that would pit the vaunted Imperial Japanese Navy against the US Pacific Fleet. The philosophy that guided Japanese military thinking throughout WWII held that the US could be defeated in a single massive naval battle. It seems shallow and foolish now, but belief in that "one battle" theory guided Japanese thinking nearly to the end of the war. In early 1942, Midway was picked by the Japanese, because it was a good spot close enough to the US they could plan a land based air attack. In the six months since Pearl Harbor, the world had learned the "new truth" about naval warfare. It's not the size of the guns, it's the number of airplanes. The ultimate paradox and the proof of that truth is the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor itself! Carrier-based Japanese aircraft were used to destroy harbor-bound battleships on a massive scale. Ultimately, the Pacific war was shortened by at least a year precisely because the Japanese carriers at Pearl Harbor failed to sink the US carriers based there. The key at Midway was intelligence, specifically US Naval Intelligence. The Navy had long before had some success decoding Japanese Navy codes. In the days leading up to the Midway battle, the Navy's decoders were able to determine that Midway would be attacked by the Japanese. The level of detail in the decodes was such that the Navy could plan and execute an "ambush" strategy aimed at catching the Japanese. Books have been written about the battle, but the score goes like this. US shows up with 3 aircraft carriers, loses 1. Japan shows up with 4 aircraft carriers, loses 4. The "importance" of the battle lies in the fact that it turned the war in the Pacific in favor of the US. The loss of four aircraft carriers essentially gutted the Japanese Navy as an offensive force. After Midway, Japanese power in the Pacific declined steadily, and the Japanese were defeated in every battle until the end of the war. In addition, victory at Midway was a serious boost to morale in the US. The early weeks and months of WWII were filled with horror stories of places like Corregidor, Bataan, Pearl Harbor. The Coral Sea battle showed that the US Navy could hold its own against the Japanese. But Midway was a clean, clear victory. The Japanese armed forces did not win a major battle after Midway.
rose
PILLOW
Drink water
when someones team loses maybe or heart attack or a steel equipment piece falls on them.
Ronald Regan during a 1980 debate
Stupidity