0
They were all
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did the Romans decide not to have in their society?
In their society, the Romans chose not to have a monarchy as their form of government. Kings were taboo to their way of thinking due to the oppressiveness of their last ruling king.
Did the emperor make the decisions at ancient roman trails?
An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.
How would worshipping the emperor while he lived affect the Romans's view of their ruler?
When you worship someone you honor them. I think the view of the emperor would be affected in a good way if people worshipped the emperor while he was living. In my opinion the people would have a lot of respect. The citizens worshipped the emperor like they worshipped the gods. Loyalty to the emperor was the same as the loyalty to the gods.
How would worshipping the emperor while he lived affect the Romans' view of their ruler?
When you worship someone you honor them. I think the view of the emperor would be affected in a good way if people worshipped the emperor while he was living. In my opinion the people would have a lot of respect. The citizens worshipped the emperor like they worshipped the gods. Loyalty to the emperor was the same as the loyalty to the gods.
What weapon's did the Romans use?
swords, axes, catapults, archers, trebuchets, box shields, and lances, though ther are others. By the way u spelled weapons wrong.
What did the Romans decide not to have in their society?
In their society, the Romans chose not to have a monarchy as their form of government. Kings were taboo to their way of thinking due to the oppressiveness of their last ruling king.
Did the emperor make the decisions at ancient roman trails?
An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.An emperor rarely made decisions at Roman trials, or even attended them, and then only if it were a trial of personal importance to the emperor himself. The Romans had a judicial system in place and they used it. However if an emperor wanted a trial to turn out a certain way, he would make his wishes known and perhaps "influence" the decision.
Who was the Romans first emperor?
Julius Ceasar, in a way. He was made Dictator for Life. After his death his great nephew Octavian became the first genuine Roman emperor given the title Augustus.
Why did the Romans use such an inhuman way to kill Spartacus's followers?
Because Spartcus and his followers had humiliated the Empire, and the Emperor needed to show he was in charge by killing the rebels in a obvious way.
How would worshipping the emperor while he lived affect the Romans's view of their ruler?
When you worship someone you honor them. I think the view of the emperor would be affected in a good way if people worshipped the emperor while he was living. In my opinion the people would have a lot of respect. The citizens worshipped the emperor like they worshipped the gods. Loyalty to the emperor was the same as the loyalty to the gods.
How would worshipping the emperor while he lived affect the Romans' view of their ruler?
When you worship someone you honor them. I think the view of the emperor would be affected in a good way if people worshipped the emperor while he was living. In my opinion the people would have a lot of respect. The citizens worshipped the emperor like they worshipped the gods. Loyalty to the emperor was the same as the loyalty to the gods.
How did rome deal with religion in a bad way?
Rome persecuted people of faith until the Romans realized that what they had been doing was immoral and wrong.
How did the Investiture Controversy limit the power of the Holy Roman Emperor over the Church?
The Emperors power was limited because if the king chose a good bishop he would be knowned in a good way nope
What weapon's did the Romans use?
swords, axes, catapults, archers, trebuchets, box shields, and lances, though ther are others. By the way u spelled weapons wrong.
What weapons did the Romans use?
swords, axes, catapults, archers, trebuchets, box shields, and lances, though ther are others. By the way u spelled weapons wrong.
What happened in March 15 44BC in Rome?
Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.Every March 15th was the ides of the month. It was a way that the Romans had for dividing time.
Did the Romans have good fashion?
The Romans did not have fashion. They were traditional in the way they dressed.
