answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Defeat in Russo-Japanese War (1904 - 1905) provoked the First Russian Revolution in 1905. Thereafter Tsarist's disordered foreign policy played significant role in starting World War I ("Great War"). In the very first days of war one Russian army was near utterly destroyed in East Prussia ("Tannenberg"), the other, commanded by general Rennenkampf, sustained heavy losses and beat a hasty retreat. The second of war's years - 1915 - was especially disastrous despite some successes in battles against Austria. To the end of 1916 situation stabilized but still human losses were heavy and economics was in visible disarray. In the beginning of 1917 there was some premature hope that Germany, Austria, Turkey and Bulgaria were at the end of their tether and final victory was at hand. In the same time leaders of Russian Parlement - "State Duma" - began to harbor seriouos suspicion that Tsar Nicolaus if victorious would try to suppress civil liberties and to abolish constitutional order. Another factor to be reckoned with was general public dissatisfaction with many hardships caused by war and governmental ineptitude. In minds of many false optimism was mingled with feelings of frustration, instability and nervousness. During such time there is always a danger that some event might trigger a whole series of unforeseen consequences. That was the case with incident at Putilov's armament works: summary dimissall of some trade union prominents led to a strike; strike led to demonstrations, disturbances and street violence, police forces were overextended and, to crown it all, some army formations refused to shoot at the demonstrators and started murdering their commanding officers. Maybe some strong-arm and determined action speedily executed by Tsar would have a chance to reverse the situation in his favor, but Tsar Nicolaus did not fit in a mould of a Machiavellian Prince, he was idealistic, rather more obstinate than persistent (his wife, Tsarin Alexandra, German by birth, was much more self-willed), tired and badly misinformed (he draws a lot of historical parallel - from Louis Seize to Shah of Iran). He yielded up to some not very strong pressure from Duma and abdicated. February Russian Revolution became a fact. As for the second, so-called October revolutuion, it was a coup d'etat executed by so-called Bolshevik's party under general leadership of Lenin. It owned its spectacular and tragic success to variety of factors, the main being inability of Provisory Government to put an end to war, to deliver a sustaineble land reform and its indecisiveness in the battle for power.

User Avatar

Wiki User

17y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

Military defeat in WW1 and poor leadership of the people by the Generals & the Royal Family, in many cases the same. Poverty proves a fertile ground for civil unrest. There ensued a power struggle & a civil war: Communist Government, or what the world saw as Communist government came into being. WW1 & WW2 would have profound effects on Russia & the world, perhaps more so than any other country.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

After Russia was defeated in the Japanese war, it was unprepared both military and technologically for the total war of WW1. It had no competent military leaders. Czar Nicholas II insisted on taking charge of the armed forces despite his lack of training. As the leadership at the top stumbled its way through a series of military and economic disasters, the Russian people grew more and more upset with the Czarist regime. The March Revolution emerged and the Russian Revolution began,.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Cause was bad life ordinary people that was majority in Russian was facing, due to Russian being involved in WW1 that was causing only troubles and second cause Tsarevitch Aleksei son of Nikolai the II was ill of hemophilia a blood illness that he got from his grandmother Queen Victoria of Great Britain , so Russian people was afraid that Tsarevitch is going to be too weak to become Tsar, and that they only will suffer under Romanovs rule....Now from end of XIX and at beginning of XX century in Russia was strong tide of communist and worker parties because of many people being workers...So communist used the situation of problems in society to come to power...

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

An economic collapse that created resentment toward the czarist system.

This answer is:
User Avatar

D

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the primary cause of the Russian Revolution in 1917?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How were the cause of the Russian revolution of 1905 and the Russian revolution of 1917 similar?

Answer this question…Both revolutions stemmed from frustration with the czarist system.


Who inspired the Russian Revolution of 1917?

Lenin inspired the Russian Revolution of 1917.Lenin


Which empire had a revolution in 1917?

The Russian Empire had a revolution in 1917.


What were the three stages of the Russian Revolution?

The three stages of the "Russian Revolution" were the 1905 Revolution after Bloody Sunday, the February Revolution of 1917 and the October Revolution of 1917.


Year of russian revolution?

1917.


What is a good opening sentence for Russian revolution history essay?

Try this: "The "Russian Revolution" was actually three revolutions: the 1905 Revolution, the February Revolution of 1917 and the October Revolution of 1917."


Who became the leader of the Soviet Union after the Russian Revolution of 1917?

Vladimir I. Lenin became the leader of the Soviet Union after the Russian Revolution of 1917.


Who were involved the Russian revolution of 1917?

Russia.


When did Russian Revolution Startr?

February 1917


What is the significance of the year 1917?

Russian revolution.


What are the factors that led to the Russian Revolution in 1917?

The cause of the Russian Revolution of 1917 was that the Czar, or emperor, Nicholas II was using all the money and treating the people unfairly.there were shortages of food and the "commoners" , or peasants and poor people, were the ones revolting because of this.


Was the russian revolution of 1917 let by the nazis?

Nazis did not lead the Russian Revolution. There were two revolutions in 1917. The February revolution was not led by anyone. It happened spontaneously. The October Revolution was led by Vladimir Lenin.