The strong points in England was when William the Conquer defeated the Anglo Saxons which was in 1066 at the battle of Hastings. Then also homages increase would bring them to a strong structure of feudalism in England.
Much like Communism and Socialism, Feudalism looks great on paper, but doesn't work out so well in practice. The strong points for this form of societal organization were found in the hierarchy. The Lords (nobles who owned vast amounts of land) provided homes and farms for the Serfs (common men and women), and saw to their protection. The Serfs cared for the land, raised food for the Lords and Vassals (more commonly known today as knights), and paid taxes out of their livestock, produce and money earned through commerce. Vassals swore themselves to the service of the Lords, and in exchange for small parcels of their own land, protected the land of the Lord they served.
It made possible a system of central Government and cohesion within many newly formed States, despite the often necessary delegation of power to many local nobles. The reason was that the feudal system was based on the firm belief by both sides in the feudal system, that any gift of office or land accepted from a 'liege lord', mostly the king, entitled him to the unswerving loyalty and service when required of those nobles.
One thing is that multiple homeages would increase the size of the military.
No, the feudal system was a medieval system.
The King or as he was known in Ancient Egypt the Pharaoh
I am not sure I understand your question. If you mean rank he was lower rank, but a bit better off than a peasant. If you mean area of Europe then he could be from any part.
Both had a feudal system
The Feudal System which provided wealth and land to vassals, jobs for knights, and work for serfs.
warrior aristocrat
decentralized political system
they both are boring to learn about
A decentralized politcal system
No, the feudal system was a medieval system.
The King or as he was known in Ancient Egypt the Pharaoh
They weren't.
Every estate was self-sufficient and produced or grew everything it needed to function.
Lords and Ladies
I am not sure I understand your question. If you mean rank he was lower rank, but a bit better off than a peasant. If you mean area of Europe then he could be from any part.
It eliminated the feudal system in Europe. Which gave increased power to the king.
Both had a feudal system