Wiki User
∙ 12y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.
The truth is that there is no difference. The only thing that makes you think that there is a difference is the name. The Greek myths are all from the ancient times, hence "Ancient Greece"
yes
The obvious response is 'better at what'? Each had their advantages and disadvantages, and ran communities and economies which were at times successful, at other times unsuccessful. Overall, it depends on what you think makes good-better-best.
It is possible if you are really strong. The Viking sword will weigh two or three times more.
xcbZc
Bastet was an powerful ancient Egyptian cat goddess, so she would have lived in ancient Egypt times.
the Phalanx
because in ancient times the roman empire had bronze sword and a angle of Greek mythology
Sparta and Athens were two of the most powerful Greek city states in ancient times.
If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.If you mean ancient Rome, it would depend on the times. At the beginning of the city the king was the most powerful magistrate, during the republic it would have been a dictator and during the principate it was the emperor.
The truth is that there is no difference. The only thing that makes you think that there is a difference is the name. The Greek myths are all from the ancient times, hence "Ancient Greece"
back then in Bible times...yes
More than 300 times; the word sword appears in the Holy Bible
Sumo; a type of wrestling and Kendo; a form of training for Sword fighting. In ancient times Kendo was the basic samurai training. It has developed into a sport now; although swords are not used a bamboo shinai (which represents the sword) is used.
The word "sword" is in the King James Version of the Bible 424 times. It is in 384 verses.
Yes. The powerful tribes of Anglo-Saxons who once ruled all of Britian developed this occupationally-derived surname back in the ancient times to denote a person employed as a cordwainer, or shoemaker. They held a family seat in Devon, from ancient times.