The Divine right theory of monarchy was a theory that gave authority and legitimization to monarchs. What it basically said was that kings and queens, and their subsequent successors, received their right to rule not only by the people, but also by God. It was their God-given right to rule the people and to be born into the ruling family.
This was formally known as the divine right of kings.
Meritocracy is a government ruled by the people that have earned the right to rule. ( such as demonstrating intelligence and virtue-merit)
Assyrian Kings claimed Divine Right, e.g. that they were appointed by the gods to rule over the people. They used their military prowess as evidence of this power.
Emperors do not "get" the rights to rule. Technically, they don't even have a right to rule, but they have a huge responsibility to the people they lead. Historically, people became emperor because they either inherited the position, or somehow had influence of the military. If the military will do what a person tells them to, then that person can control a country. People don't want to disobey the new "emperor" if he has an army that will punish them. And thus, he controls the people. If the military refuses to cooperate, he can claim to be emperor, but won't be able to control anyone.
To protect the minority, or an individual, from the majority.
Democracy (literally, "rule by the people"). Not to be confused with a republic, which is rule by officials chosen by the people.
He supported the principle of popular sovereignity. He claimed that the source of all political powershould be the people: the legitimacy of the state is created and maintained by the will and consent of its people. The monarchs do not have a divine right to rule, they get their power from the people and consequeently should rule for the good of the people.
The people give up their right to oppose the government when they accept Totalitarian rule.
They are elected by people.
to protect citizens' rights.
the people who elected them. They are accountable for their actions and decisions, as they are meant to serve the best interests of the citizens they represent. Failure to fulfill their responsibilities can result in being voted out of office in the next election.
I think you are confused because it was not up to the colonists to protect British rule. It was up to the British forces.
Becasue people know it is right and will someday rule the world..
defend who has the right to rule?
Not really. The declaration talked about who had a right to govern. It did not dispute the need for government, but justified the right to be independent of the rule of the English king and the right of the people to choose their government. It attacked the idea that people like King George had to right to rule because of their royal birth.
The Divine right theory of monarchy was a theory that gave authority and legitimization to monarchs. What it basically said was that kings and queens, and their subsequent successors, received their right to rule not only by the people, but also by God. It was their God-given right to rule the people and to be born into the ruling family.