the PATRICIANS. the poor, common people were the PLEBIANS.
Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.
Generally there were two broad definitions:Patrician and PlebeianPatricians came from 'old' families, although that did not necessarily make them rich. Most of the senators (especially in the early Republic) would have been patricians.Plebeians were those whose ancestors had not achieved greatness (such as a consulship) - but they could be quite wealthy and rise to power (this was seen quite often in the Late Republic, with men such as Cicero and Marius).
Patricians
Patricians. The other poor people who weren't slaves were called Plebeians. (pronounced plaabeeans)
the PATRICIANS. the poor, common people were the PLEBIANS.
Patricians
Wealthy people of Rome were called Patricians. American Government class? Me too. Tcarver6
Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.Rich Romans were called rich Romans. There was no special term for them. Do not confuse the classes of the patricians and plebeians with wealth. At the beginning of Roman society, the patricians were the wealthy and the plebeians the poor. However things changedand although the classes remained the same, wealth many times changed hands. There were patricians who had lost their wealth, such as Sulla's family, and plebeians who had gained, such as Marc Antony's family. There were also the equites who were the business people who were extremely wealthy.
The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.
Ancient Romans (Plebeians, Equestrians and Patricians)
Patricians, although a plebeian could with work gain wealth
In the Roman Government the Senate was made up of 'Patricians' who are men from wealthy families. The 'Plebeians' were the poor people and they had no say in how their country was run. In the Roman Government the Senate was made up of 'Patricians' who are men from wealthy families. The 'Plebeians' were the poor people and they had no say in how their country was run. In the Roman Government the Senate was made up of 'Patricians' who are men from wealthy families. The 'Plebeians' were the poor people and they had no say in how their country was run.
It depended upon their wealth. Remember that all patricians were not necesdsarily rich, as some of the families had lost their fortunes over the years. Patrician was a class determined by birth, not wealth. The wealthy patricians (or any other wealthy class of people) made their homes on the Palatine, Esqualine and Caelian hills.It depended upon their wealth. Remember that all patricians were not necesdsarily rich, as some of the families had lost their fortunes over the years. Patrician was a class determined by birth, not wealth. The wealthy patricians (or any other wealthy class of people) made their homes on the Palatine, Esqualine and Caelian hills.It depended upon their wealth. Remember that all patricians were not necesdsarily rich, as some of the families had lost their fortunes over the years. Patrician was a class determined by birth, not wealth. The wealthy patricians (or any other wealthy class of people) made their homes on the Palatine, Esqualine and Caelian hills.It depended upon their wealth. Remember that all patricians were not necesdsarily rich, as some of the families had lost their fortunes over the years. Patrician was a class determined by birth, not wealth. The wealthy patricians (or any other wealthy class of people) made their homes on the Palatine, Esqualine and Caelian hills.It depended upon their wealth. Remember that all patricians were not necesdsarily rich, as some of the families had lost their fortunes over the years. Patrician was a class determined by birth, not wealth. The wealthy patricians (or any other wealthy class of people) made their homes on the Palatine, Esqualine and Caelian hills.It depended upon their wealth. Remember that all patricians were not necesdsarily rich, as some of the families had lost their fortunes over the years. Patrician was a class determined by birth, not wealth. The wealthy patricians (or any other wealthy class of people) made their homes on the Palatine, Esqualine and Caelian hills.It depended upon their wealth. Remember that all patricians were not necesdsarily rich, as some of the families had lost their fortunes over the years. Patrician was a class determined by birth, not wealth. The wealthy patricians (or any other wealthy class of people) made their homes on the Palatine, Esqualine and Caelian hills.It depended upon their wealth. Remember that all patricians were not necesdsarily rich, as some of the families had lost their fortunes over the years. Patrician was a class determined by birth, not wealth. The wealthy patricians (or any other wealthy class of people) made their homes on the Palatine, Esqualine and Caelian hills.It depended upon their wealth. Remember that all patricians were not necesdsarily rich, as some of the families had lost their fortunes over the years. Patrician was a class determined by birth, not wealth. The wealthy patricians (or any other wealthy class of people) made their homes on the Palatine, Esqualine and Caelian hills.
Generally there were two broad definitions:Patrician and PlebeianPatricians came from 'old' families, although that did not necessarily make them rich. Most of the senators (especially in the early Republic) would have been patricians.Plebeians were those whose ancestors had not achieved greatness (such as a consulship) - but they could be quite wealthy and rise to power (this was seen quite often in the Late Republic, with men such as Cicero and Marius).
government official were patrician or on the landholding upper class.no because he was in war with the geeksUPDATE: Plebeians were citizens not a person. they probably had less rights because they were only citizens, and Patricians were often royalty.
Many time the rich Roman people are called patricians, but this is not entirely accurate. In the early days of the city, yes, the patricians were the wealthy class, but over time some of them lost their fortunes and even though they were still of the patrician class, they were not rich. Other social classes also gained wealth. Many plebeians were rich as well as the equites. Also many freedmen were not only very wealthy, but also government officials or advisers.Many time the rich Roman people are called patricians, but this is not entirely accurate. In the early days of the city, yes, the patricians were the wealthy class, but over time some of them lost their fortunes and even though they were still of the patrician class, they were not rich. Other social classes also gained wealth. Many plebeians were rich as well as the equites. Also many freedmen were not only very wealthy, but also government officials or advisers.Many time the rich Roman people are called patricians, but this is not entirely accurate. In the early days of the city, yes, the patricians were the wealthy class, but over time some of them lost their fortunes and even though they were still of the patrician class, they were not rich. Other social classes also gained wealth. Many plebeians were rich as well as the equites. Also many freedmen were not only very wealthy, but also government officials or advisers.Many time the rich Roman people are called patricians, but this is not entirely accurate. In the early days of the city, yes, the patricians were the wealthy class, but over time some of them lost their fortunes and even though they were still of the patrician class, they were not rich. Other social classes also gained wealth. Many plebeians were rich as well as the equites. Also many freedmen were not only very wealthy, but also government officials or advisers.Many time the rich Roman people are called patricians, but this is not entirely accurate. In the early days of the city, yes, the patricians were the wealthy class, but over time some of them lost their fortunes and even though they were still of the patrician class, they were not rich. Other social classes also gained wealth. Many plebeians were rich as well as the equites. Also many freedmen were not only very wealthy, but also government officials or advisers.Many time the rich Roman people are called patricians, but this is not entirely accurate. In the early days of the city, yes, the patricians were the wealthy class, but over time some of them lost their fortunes and even though they were still of the patrician class, they were not rich. Other social classes also gained wealth. Many plebeians were rich as well as the equites. Also many freedmen were not only very wealthy, but also government officials or advisers.Many time the rich Roman people are called patricians, but this is not entirely accurate. In the early days of the city, yes, the patricians were the wealthy class, but over time some of them lost their fortunes and even though they were still of the patrician class, they were not rich. Other social classes also gained wealth. Many plebeians were rich as well as the equites. Also many freedmen were not only very wealthy, but also government officials or advisers.Many time the rich Roman people are called patricians, but this is not entirely accurate. In the early days of the city, yes, the patricians were the wealthy class, but over time some of them lost their fortunes and even though they were still of the patrician class, they were not rich. Other social classes also gained wealth. Many plebeians were rich as well as the equites. Also many freedmen were not only very wealthy, but also government officials or advisers.Many time the rich Roman people are called patricians, but this is not entirely accurate. In the early days of the city, yes, the patricians were the wealthy class, but over time some of them lost their fortunes and even though they were still of the patrician class, they were not rich. Other social classes also gained wealth. Many plebeians were rich as well as the equites. Also many freedmen were not only very wealthy, but also government officials or advisers.