Congress passed an act in 1816 to start the Second Bank of the United States to help control currency in the nation. The Bank opened a branch in Maryland to issue bank notes, carry out transactions, etc. In 1818, Maryland passed an act to tax the Bank. James McCulloch, head of the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank, refused to pay the tax that Maryland had imposed.
Maryland filed a lawsuit in court against McCulloch in an attempt to collect the tax. Maryland stated that the Constitution did not allow the federal government to charter a bank, so the Bank was unconstitutional. When the case reached the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Marshall declared that the Bank was constitutional because of the elastic clause and Congress's implied powers. According to the Supreme Court, Congress had the authority to make any law necessary and proper for carrying out its duties, including the right to charter a national bank.
In the end, the Supreme Court decided that the federal government had the power to set up a national bank and the states did not have the power to tax the federal government. Marshall's reason was that the power to tax involves the power to destroy. The Mcculloch v. Maryland case was fundamental in establishing (1) the principle of Congress's implied powers and (2) federal government's precedence over state governments.
Case Citation:
McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
James Monroe
McCulloch v. Maryland: Chief Justice Marshall
The case was initially filed in the County Court of Baltimore, Maryland.Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
The boundary lines between states' rights and the rights of the federal government to pass laws governing the states were made clearer by McCulloch vs. Maryland.
McCulloch was decided by a unanimous 7-0 vote.Supreme Court JusticesChief Justice John MarshallJustice Bushrod WashingtonJustice William JohnsonJustice Henry Brockholst LivingstonJustice Thomas ToddJustice Gabriel DuvallJustice Joseph StoryCase Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
What is the problem of McCulloch v. Maryland?
What were the long-term consequences of the ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland?
McCulloch v. Maryland prevented states from taxing the federal government. The state of Maryland was trying to impose a tax on all bank notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. At the time, the only bank of this sort in Maryland was the Second Bank of the United States.
Maryland wins
What Constitutional power did McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819 test?
Gibbons v Ogden
James McCulloch was cashier and head of the Baltimore, Maryland, branch of The Second Bank of the United States who refused to pay a new tax the State of Maryland attempted to impose on the bank. McCulloch was the nominal defendant in Maryland's case against the federal government in the state courts, and the petitioner in the US Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland, (1819).Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)For more information about McCulloch v. Maryland, see Related Links, below.
McCulloch v. Maryland settled that the National Bank was constitutional. Also it settled that Maryland does not have the power to tax a institution created by congress.
McCulloch v. Maryland.An example of national supremacy clause can be seen in the case McCulloch v. Maryland.
You need to do this on your own not searching it
James Monroe
How did the Supreme Court’s ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland strengthen the federal government ?The court case known as McCulloch v. Maryland of March 6, 1819, was a seminal Supreme Court Case that affirmed the right of implied powers, that there were powers that the federal government had that were not specifically mentioned in the Constitution, but were implied by it.