they didnt tolerate religious freedom. anyone who believed in a different god was kicked out.
AnswerAccording to Sanford Hoadley Cobb's book The rise of religious liberty in America: a history, the answer is no, they did not. See the link.Church of England.
Reference the great awakening and the mingling of races... for a third, I'm not sure... to what extent: people could worship or not worship as they pleased. Answer Consider that the colonies had a good number of folks who wanted out from under the religious oppression of England. They became more tolerant because they'd had it done to them, and because they wished to apply the golden rule.
During the seventeenth century, Puritans came to American looking for hope, freedom, wealth and happiness. Many found it, but many missed the boat. As many as 6,500 to 8,000 people annually left, as 25,000 to 30,000 left during the first three decades of the century. Most traveled as young, unmarried servants. Puritans were very much trying to find a world of their own that they could manage, control, take over, and look over as a whole. When they came to settle, they had to decide quickly what they wanted in life and how they were going to achieve their goal. You had to take into consideration of where your most pure land was, where there was open land, where the many Indian tribes were, and where the weather would affect your growth as a planter. Puritans came to America wanting to spread their own religion as a way that everyone would be under and no problems would or could occur. Most puritans went under the religion of Calvinism as many were often religious bigots because they discriminated against the Indians and only accepted the kind that didn't like Quakers. By the end of the seventeenth century, Parliament was much in progress for making rules and regulations for others to follow.
Anne Bradstreet did not intend for her poetry to be Published at all so she did write more about her feelings rather than to teach to others like puritan writers are supposed to do . There for when Anne's brother in-law published her work without her knowing there were poems with signs of disbeliefe and how she felt about religion alot of the time, this led some puritans to feel angry or like Bradstreeet did not really know what she was doing, in all the researc i have done i havent seen much onwhat the puritans thought or saw in Anne Bradstreet but im guessing this would be the reactions from the way the puritans believed and saw in the religion part of life. Anne was a very religious person she just had som,e doubts and she wrote about those doubts in her poetry, and some ohter people might not be able to understand that because maybe they believed differently and maybe didnt have those doubts.
they didnt tolerate religious freedom. anyone who believed in a different god was kicked out.
Well, many Puritans were separatists. And even though some of them claimed to be non-separating because they had not denounced their former church, in essence their religious practices and differences made them separate anyway. Puritans wanted reform, and although the separation was influenced by external forces to some extent, many groups of puritans separated themselves, not only religiously, but geographically... so, some of them were separatists only in action and not in philosophy, whereas others were separatists in both ways.
AnswerAccording to Sanford Hoadley Cobb's book The rise of religious liberty in America: a history, the answer is no, they did not. See the link.Church of England.
because they wanted to
Yes, the Catholic (and to much extent any established church) was and is fundamentally corrupt and they wanted a form of worshiping Christ/God which was simpler and more accessible to people.
It depends on the legislation of the country you live and to some extent also on your religious beliefs.
Puritans generally viewed alcohol consumption as a sin due to its potential to lead to moral corruption. They were also critical of excessive focus on artistic beauty and poetry, as they believed it could distract from spiritual matters. While not all Puritans condemned these things outright, they typically emphasized simplicity and practicality over indulgence in worldly pleasures.
Reference the great awakening and the mingling of races... for a third, I'm not sure... to what extent: people could worship or not worship as they pleased. Answer Consider that the colonies had a good number of folks who wanted out from under the religious oppression of England. They became more tolerant because they'd had it done to them, and because they wished to apply the golden rule.
Extent
As of 2012, there is no formal curriculum including same-sex marriage in Massachusetts schools. However, to whatever extent that the issue of marriage is broached at school (e.g., in health class), the current reality is presented rather than the previous state of affairs. The current reality in Massachusetts is that marriage is not limited to opposite-sex partners only. This is the reality that children will be expected to function in.
Consult a Massachusetts state lawyer to determine how to obtain a secular/state annulment. This is the Catholic Answer section. Obtaining an annulment in the Catholic Church has nothing to do with secular/state law except to the extent that the couple seeking an annulment in The Catholic Church must first obtain a Decree of Divorce from the state.
Since America as a nation began with a revolution against European colonial rule, America has insisted on doing its own thing. And to some extent, conservatism is a remnant of the Cold War era. Americans are accustomed to equating socialism with communism, and communism was for a long time thought to be the enemy of America. So America winds up with conservatism as an alternative to socialism.Another PerspectiveConservatism finds it roots much further back. The earliest Americans were Puritans. The earliest life in Massachusetts was ruled by the Puritans. The Puritans of the Massachusetts Bay Colony were Calvinists who believed that all mankind was condemned to eternal damnation except for the "Elect", a precious few who were granted salvation. The Elect were bound to oversee the enforcement of God's laws in society. They were uncompromising in their moral and theological principles. Their concern with proper behavior led to a diligent interest in the activity of their neighbors.Ever since the US Constitution was written and adopted by people who intended to separate church and state, the religious leaders have been trying to regain their stranglehold on America. Religious groups do not try to exert as much pressure to incorporate their religious doctrines into public law in other Western countries. Europe broke away from the pope hundreds of years ago and is more vigilant about religious interference into government.The Massachusetts Body of Liberties established in 1641 provided, in part, that:If any man after legall conviction shall have or worship any other god, but the lord god, he shall be put to death.If any person shall Blaspheme the name of god, the father, Sonne or Holie Ghost, with direct, expresse, presumptuous or high handed blasphemie, or shall curse god in the like manner, he shall be put to death.If any man lyeth with mankinde as he lyeth with a woeman, both of them have committed abhomination, they both shall surely be put to death.If any person committeth Adultery with a maried or espoused wife, the Adulterer and Adulteresse shall surely be put to death.You can read the entire 1641 legal code at the link provided below.