Kings
A lack of true central power weakened and doomed the Rus' to outside ... Lacking a feudal system of vassal loyalty made it impossible for any prince, .... In theory, this meant that the land was held under The Crown as ultimate feudal superior.
He was someone who was underneath the tenant in chief in the feudal system
An agricultural laborer bound under the feudal system to work on his lord's estate.
The short answer is "the feudal system." Nobles would raise armies from their own territories. Knights were, essentially, "officers" ... they were from wealthy aristocratic families who owned things like armor and swords. Being "knighted" was recognition from other knights (and ultimately from the nobles) that you had armor and a sword and were willing and able to use them in a way the other knights found acceptable. Lesser nobles ... those who didn't command much territory ... would recognize some higher-ranked noble as their feudal lord. In exchange for this, they could expect a certain amount of help if they were attacked, but in exchange would have to send taxes/tribute and knights (and potentially armies) to their feudal lord when requested. These higher-ranked nobles would then to the same to an even higher-ranked noble, and so on up the chain. The King would therefore have several vassals, each of whom would have their own vassals, many of them with their own vassals. If the king needed an army, he'd have some of his own knights, and would levy the nobles under him to provide more.
to have parties and eat chips
Most groups under the feudal system had a lord or noble who owned land and provided protection in exchange for services or loyalty. Additionally, there was a hierarchical structure with a clear social order, with peasants working the land and knights serving as warriors. The feudal system was based on the exchange of land for loyalty and services.
a labourer who labours under a feudal system
Yes a Tenant-in-chief would be expected to provide knights to fight for his feudal lord. He therefore commanded knights.
Knights typically served under lords as vassals, swearing loyalty in exchange for land and protection. Lords provided knights with a place to live, resources, and support in exchange for military service and loyalty. This relationship was based on feudal obligations and mutual benefit, reinforcing the hierarchy of the feudal system.
Kings
During the middle ages most societies operated under some form of feudal system.
A lack of true central power weakened and doomed the Rus' to outside ... Lacking a feudal system of vassal loyalty made it impossible for any prince, .... In theory, this meant that the land was held under The Crown as ultimate feudal superior.
because it work for years but the people got out for the feudal system for the right to vote if they were stal in the system we would be it it to int he usa but they did not so were not
A chart showing the different social classes under the feudal system is represented by a triangle. The lowest class in society can be found at the bottom while the highest class is at the topmost.
the king sits on the top the church officials and noble under king and the knights at the bottom of them and way at the bottom the peasants
Samurais or bushi.