Biological weapons of any sort are unethical and inhumane. The WW1 carnage of mustard gas (a chemical weapon) was so horrific that neither the Allied military or the Germans used in WW2 against each other.
Few in history have resorted to bio or chemical weapons, and they have been roundly condemned and vilified worldwide:
* Japan's "451 Unit" who used them against Chinese civilian prisoners. Many of the '451 Unit" officers were executed / imprisoned after Japan's surrender in WW2.
* Nazi Germany's SS used them on their Jewish and other concentration camp inmates. The Allies executed those SS officers and men following WW2.
*Saddam Hussein, Iraq, against Iranian troops in the Iraqi-Iranian War (started by Saddam): 1983- Sarin Gas, 1985 - Tabun.
1988: gas attack against Kurdish civilians in Halabja, killing 5-7,000
* Bashier Asad, Syria, against his own people in the 2010 - present day rebellion.
Biochemical Warfare is war using weapons of a biological or chemical nature. such as biotoxins. Anthrax bombs are a good example of bichemical weapons. To use weapons of mass distruction.
When biological weapons have been used the outcome has been massive death and biological destruction. It affects all things in the area used. When Hessian used biological weapons against his people whole populations died. Since it is biological it stays in the environment and can mutate so it has been agreed not to use them.
Using chemical weapons (which were being stockpiled already for use in the invasion). Using biological weapons (not really available at the time), Walking away and letting Japan take back the pacific and asia.
126 Countries
Bioweapons can wipe out humans
Wars using biological agents as weapons.
Biochemical Warfare is war using weapons of a biological or chemical nature. such as biotoxins. Anthrax bombs are a good example of bichemical weapons. To use weapons of mass distruction.
Dana A. Shea has written: 'Small-scale terrorist attacks using chemical and biological agents' -- subject(s): Biological weapons, Bioterrorism, Chemical terrorism, Chemical weapons, Terrorism
No Because Chile Isn't All in On Biological Weapons.
I know of no "nuclear biological" weapons, perhaps you meant nuclear, biological, chemical (NBC) weapons, which can be any one of these.
Nuclear weapons weapons of mass destruction, biological weapons.
There are many places where one could find information on biological weapons. One could check 'Ready' for information on biological weapons and threats.
Biological weapons are germs weaponized into superfine powders able to be breathed in and cause death or illness.
Biological weapons involve living things, such as germs. Mercury is a chemical, not a biological. Bio weapons might include the diseases of anthrax, plague, typhus, Ebola, etc.
Nuclear weapons, Biological Weapons, Chemical Weapons.
anthrax and botulin toxin.
No, both are legal weapons for nations to use in war. Only chemical and biological weapons are prohibited by international law (although that has not stopped certain countries from using them).