They call it 'Pre-history'.
to a greater out look, both colonialists and nationalist historians are prisoners of their time as they wrote their history being governed by the ruling elite governmentof their time, their history was so limited and mainly designed to promote and legitimise the ruling power of the time ,they did not write history just for the sake of writing but were being influenced by the prevailing situation of their time
Historians are still working on his family tree, so there is no answer to this at this time.
Nobody. He was not well-known in his time (most historians of the time don't mention him); and he plays no part in Judaism.
Pre-history is the time before writing, where as history is after.
They call it 'Pre-history'.
As far as both colonial and nationalist historians are concerned they were prisoners of their time to a larger extent.As both history being influenced by the situation. Colonial historians constructed history to justify colonization while nationalist constructed history to spread nationalism. How ever to a lesser extent both colonial and nationalist historians were not prisoners of their time as they write history using common sense,feelings ,objective and favour.
'Pre', or before, and History form the word prehistory, so "Before - History" History is mostly a made up idea from humans, and it is written history that is "History" So yeah. Before written history, like the other answer to this question.
To understand how the study of history has changed over time
A scientist who studies history is typically called a historian. Historians analyze and interpret past events, cultures, and social behaviors in order to understand the development of human societies over time.
Historians identify this time period in human history as the beginning of 'recorded history'. Writing allows us to express, explain, document and share the reasons why we do what we do. While at the same time it creates a record for others to use to learn and understand.
to a greater out look, both colonialists and nationalist historians are prisoners of their time as they wrote their history being governed by the ruling elite governmentof their time, their history was so limited and mainly designed to promote and legitimise the ruling power of the time ,they did not write history just for the sake of writing but were being influenced by the prevailing situation of their time
Historians apply spatial frames to the study of history because dividing history into periods allows historians to present events in order, a simple way of describing a general time period in history. Once evidence is gathered and evaluated, historians use it to reconstruct the past. They often begin by establishing a chronology, or sequence of events. Placing events in sequence helps determine cause and effect and reveals patterns over time. Historians also use evidence to analyze and interpret history. They seek to explain how and why things happened and to assess the significance of past events. Historians may bring their own point of view to their analysis of history. But careful historians try to ensure that the weight of the evidence supports their interpretation.
Historians for the last few centuries have recorded time before Jesus Christ as BC and then the year.
um that answer is incorrect. im a history teacher and it is calendars and dating systems.
The way the world reacted at the time, and how much it affected things today.
Some common approaches in the study of history include political history, social history, economic history, cultural history, and intellectual history. These approaches allow historians to analyze different aspects of human experience and how they have evolved over time. By using these approaches, historians can gain a deeper understanding of the past and its impact on the present.