1. The citizenship was definitely different. In Greece you had to be a free, native born, landowning, male. In Rome your parents had to be born there, you had to serve in the army, or you could buy citizenship. 2.The ancient Greeks were either a democracy, oligarchy, or monarchy. It depended which city- state you were in. Greece had such a divided land because of the geography, they couldn't stay in just one type of government. But Rome was all together so it was mostly a republic. This type of government is where citizens vote for their leader, the leader doesn't come from a dynasty unless the Senate tells them different. 3. When the people in the army volunteered in Greece, Rome did too until a general came along named,Marius. He became a consul in 107 B.C. He began to recruit soldiers from the poor, in return he paid them and promised them land.
Originally, there was no Greek government. Each city was its own country, governed as what we would now call an independent nation. Some cities were monarchies or oligarchies, but some developed democracies, where all the voting citizens came together in a public square to vote on how to govern the city. Some of these democratic city-states became empires, but still remained democracies, in the sense that citizens still voted on governmental functions - but many people living in the empire were not citizens and could not vote.
Originally the Roman government was a monarchy, but it became a Republic, where the voting citizens elected representatives to run the government. As it was becoming an empire, Rome remained a Republic in terms of how those runing the government were chosen. Most residents of the far-flung empire where not citizens and did not participate in that selection. Even after it was really run by an Emperor, the forms of a republic were retained for hundreds of years.
The Roman government changed over the 1,200 years of ancient Rome's history. Tt had a monarchy for 244 years (753 BC-508 BC), a republic for 482 years (509 BC-27 BC) and rule by emperors (27 BC-276 AD).
Greece was divided into many different states. Each state had it own political system.
Aristotle, the ancient greek philosopher, classified the political systems of the Greek states into: monarchy (government by one man for the common good) Tyranny (arbitrary rule by one man for his personal advantage) aristocracy (government by the best people according by virtue alone) oligarchy (rule by the rich) democracy (rule by the people) and mixed constitution (a combination of elements of the other systems mentioned above).
Following Aristotle's model, the ancient historian and political writer Polybius interpreted the political system of the Roman Republic as a mixed constitution. By this he meant that Rome had a complex political system which combined elements of three simpler political systems: monarchy (the two consuls who headed the Republic), aristocracy (the senate) and democracy (the popular assemblies which voted on bills and elected the officers of state). He argued that such a complex system was better than the simpler systems because the latter had flaws. Combining various elements of different systems was better because the three parts of the republican system would check each other with the result that no part could abuse power or "degenerate." This ensured stability.
Early Athens was ruled by the aristocracy. Then there was a period of democracy (early 6th century BC-541 BC) a spell of rule by tyrants who in the Greek world were necessarily despots, they were men who seized power by force (541-510 BC) and the return of democracy (501-338 BC). This was followed by Athens being ruled by the Kingdom of Macedon (388 - 200 BC), an independent spell and then rule by the Romans (87-395 AD). Rome was a monarchy for 244 years, a republic for 482 years and rule by emperors for 506 years.
There have been comparisons between the Roman Republic and the democratic period of Athenian history.
The biggest difference was that Athens was a democracy and Rome was an oligarchy with some democratic elements.
Democracy was invented in Athens in the late 6th century BC. To the Greek this meant power to the people and they meant it literally. All the decisions were made by male citizens gathered in the assembly of the people, which also voted on bills. The citizens also sat in the courts. The executive implemented the will of the people.
In Rome power was exercised by an oligarchy of aristocrats and wealthy entrepreneurs The equites or equestrians). There was not a centralised executive like a cabinet or administration. There were five types of elected officers of state who acted independently within the remit of their offices. The top officers were the two annually elected consuls who were the heads of the republic.
The senate was not an elected body. Its members were aristocrats and former officers of state. It was not a legislative body, but it could issue decrees. It was an advisory body. It became the most powerful political body in the Republic
The democratic elements of the Roman Republic were the three popular assemblies. The Assembly of the Soldiers voted on war and peace, elected the senior officers of state, acted as a court of appeal for capital punishment cases until 81 BC and originally it voted on bills. The Assembly of the Tribes elected the junior officers and acted as a court of appeal for other cases, also until 81 BC. In 81 BC all appeals were transferred to a special jury court. The Plebeian Council elected the plebeian tribunes and later became the body for voting on bills.
An important difference between greek and Romans attitudes was that
The main difference between Roman and Greek antiquity is the Roman adaptation of the Greek gods. The Romans used many of the same gods, but changed their names. Romans also tended to focus less on technology and more on aesthetics than the Greeks.
Only male citizens were allowed to vote in both the Roman and Grek government.
the differences between greek and roman architecture go very, very far beyond a simple answer here on wikianswers. having said that, one noticeable different deals with enclosures. in a greek temple, all 4 sides are open air - nothing but exposed columns (ex: parthenon in athens, Greece). roman architecture took this basic form but gave it directionality. that is - the building has a clear "front" which is the short side with open air columns. the other sides also have exposed columns, but with walls between the columns (ex: maison carree in nimes, France). the examples in this answer only deal with the classical temple shaped building. there was much more to both greek and roman architecture that is much too broad to address here. a great reference for further review might be applicable chapters from tractenberg's tome on architectural history. you will find issues such as material differences (roman brick), use of arch to produce extremely large column free spans, urban design differences. ampitheater differences, and so on.
government and law
An important difference between greek and Romans attitudes was that
Roman theater was done by ancient Romans. Greek theater was done by ancient Greeks. Hope I helped.
The name. That's all. Greek: Aphrodite. Roman: Venus.
same question... geography assignment.
Saturn was also known as Saturnus (in Roman), and Cronus (in Greek).
The main difference between Roman and Greek antiquity is the Roman adaptation of the Greek gods. The Romans used many of the same gods, but changed their names. Romans also tended to focus less on technology and more on aesthetics than the Greeks.
No, though Greek and Roman mythology shared many features, they had differences in rites and rituals. Likewise, the same can be said of Roman Catholicism and Greek Orthodoxy.
The Great SchismThis was a split of the Christian church between the Roman Catholics and the Greek Orthodox.Reasons include:disagreement as to who is the head of the church, the Pope or Jesus?differences in the way in which religious rites were administeredCatholic Church spoke Latin, the Greek Orthodox spoke Greek
Only male citizens were allowed to vote in both the Roman and Grek government.
Cultural differences between Roman Catholics and Byzantine Christians contributed to the
Heracles is the true Greek name for Hercules, Hercules is the Roman version of his name. Other than the different Roman and Greek names there is no differences in the person or what it was said that he did or could do.
There are many subtle differences between Greek and Roman art, and while most Roman art is an imitation of Greek art, there are some parts that remain different. Painting and sculpting people is one such area. The easiest way to think of it is that the Greeks preferred to produce an ideal artistic form while the Romans preferred realistic portraits.