No not all slaves were treated the same some slaves reacived nice masters which would educate them like phyllis wheately she was a slave and reicived a nice master and became a foumurs poet. But if you got a mean master they would mistreat the slaves by wiping them with a wipe or burn or even killed. so they deisided so run away to try to escape to the under ground railrode.
The slaves were not treated good at all I guess you can try to imagine jail now and then multiply it by 100 and then you will see how the slaves were treated.
not all slaves were treated the same because some were lucky enough to get nice masters. for an example phyllis wheatley had a very nice master who decided to educate her and she became a famous poet. that's not true. the females were raped by their masters to continue their family lines.
well they were treated like the were a pice of gaarbage,and they were wipped.Slaves didnt really have any rights they were just pushed around by the owners,all slaves did was work day in and day out.Hope that answers your question
In the middle of 18 to 1900s, they were treated as slaves.
in the early part of the Victorian era slaves were treated equally to the past although many states had banned slavery as in the relation ship to the Victorian era to how slaves are treated i see no relation.
The slaves were not treated good at all I guess you can try to imagine jail now and then multiply it by 100 and then you will see how the slaves were treated.
the same as not married slaves ...it didnt matter a slave was a slave
not all slaves were treated the same because some were lucky enough to get nice masters. for an example phyllis wheatley had a very nice master who decided to educate her and she became a famous poet. that's not true. the females were raped by their masters to continue their family lines.
During Reconstruction, many black slaves stayed in the South after the Civil War. With the exception of being enslaved, they were often treated the same as they had before they were freed. Slaves who migrated to the North were on the whole treated better.
very poorly because they weren't fully spanish
they were treated badly because they were slaves. people didnt care about there health all they cared about were getting them home so that they could get them to work.
Not all Roman slaves were treated badly, a few were trusted household or personal servants. However, many were treated badly since Rome saw them as an inexhaustible supply of cheap and disposable labour as more and more territories were conquered by Rome, in much the same ways that African slaves were treated in the Americas.
Women and slaves were treated unfairly because they were not allowed to be citizens,vote, and did not have any rights.there were no slaves in Sparta, and the women were treated with dignity.
Women and slaves were treated unfairly because they were not allowed to be citizens,vote, and did not have any rights.there were no slaves in Sparta, and the women were treated with dignity.
how were the slaves treated in the cape
they were treated like slaves
Slaves would not be treated well as they were seen as common animals without rights