0
Your question is rather difficult to answer as Vitallius was only in power for eight months. From that brief time, the ancient writers claim that he was very self-indulgent and was influenced and controlled by his generals rather than the other way around. So on that basis you would have to say that he was a bad emperor. However he was not actually in power long enough for us to form a reliable judgement.
Your question is rather difficult to answer as Vitallius was only in power for eight months. From that brief time, the ancient writers claim that he was very self-indulgent and was influenced and controlled by his generals rather than the other way around. So on that basis you would have to say that he was a bad emperor. However he was not actually in power long enough for us to form a reliable judgement.
Your question is rather difficult to answer as Vitallius was only in power for eight months. From that brief time, the ancient writers claim that he was very self-indulgent and was influenced and controlled by his generals rather than the other way around. So on that basis you would have to say that he was a bad emperor. However he was not actually in power long enough for us to form a reliable judgement.
Your question is rather difficult to answer as Vitallius was only in power for eight months. From that brief time, the ancient writers claim that he was very self-indulgent and was influenced and controlled by his generals rather than the other way around. So on that basis you would have to say that he was a bad emperor. However he was not actually in power long enough for us to form a reliable judgement.
Your question is rather difficult to answer as Vitallius was only in power for eight months. From that brief time, the ancient writers claim that he was very self-indulgent and was influenced and controlled by his generals rather than the other way around. So on that basis you would have to say that he was a bad emperor. However he was not actually in power long enough for us to form a reliable judgement.
Your question is rather difficult to answer as Vitallius was only in power for eight months. From that brief time, the ancient writers claim that he was very self-indulgent and was influenced and controlled by his generals rather than the other way around. So on that basis you would have to say that he was a bad emperor. However he was not actually in power long enough for us to form a reliable judgement.
Your question is rather difficult to answer as Vitallius was only in power for eight months. From that brief time, the ancient writers claim that he was very self-indulgent and was influenced and controlled by his generals rather than the other way around. So on that basis you would have to say that he was a bad emperor. However he was not actually in power long enough for us to form a reliable judgement.
Your question is rather difficult to answer as Vitallius was only in power for eight months. From that brief time, the ancient writers claim that he was very self-indulgent and was influenced and controlled by his generals rather than the other way around. So on that basis you would have to say that he was a bad emperor. However he was not actually in power long enough for us to form a reliable judgement.
Your question is rather difficult to answer as Vitallius was only in power for eight months. From that brief time, the ancient writers claim that he was very self-indulgent and was influenced and controlled by his generals rather than the other way around. So on that basis you would have to say that he was a bad emperor. However he was not actually in power long enough for us to form a reliable judgement.
Your question is rather difficult to answer as Vitallius was only in power for eight months. From that brief time, the ancient writers claim that he was very self-indulgent and was influenced and controlled by his generals rather than the other way around. So on that basis you would have to say that he was a bad emperor. However he was not actually in power long enough for us to form a reliable judgement.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Was germanicus Julius Caesar a good or bad emperor?
He wasn't an emperor.
Who did the Roman Emperor Nero succeed?
The year after Nero's death is known as the year of the four emperors. Technically, Galba was the one who succeeded Nero, but he didn't last long and was overthrown by Otho, who in turn was overthrown by Vitellius., who in turn was overthrown by Vespasian.
Was Tang Taizong a good or bad emperor?
terrible.
How did vitellius become emperor on Rome?
Vespasian became emperor by a military alliance. His own troops backed him and he also had the alliance of the Syrian troops. It was enough for him to overpower his other rivals and become emperor. The news of Galba marching on Rome, caused Vaspasian to temporarily suspend his crusade to end the revolt in Jerusalem.
Was HiroHito a good leader?
Hirohito was a good Emperor that made bad desions in his life
Who was the first ancient Roman emperor not born on the Italian Peninsula?
The first Roman emperor that we definitely know was not nobility was Vespasian. However, there's a possibility that Vitellius who came before him, was the first, as there is a question about his ancestry.The first Roman emperor that we definitely know was not nobility was Vespasian. However, there's a possibility that Vitellius who came before him, was the first, as there is a question about his ancestry.The first Roman emperor that we definitely know was not nobility was Vespasian. However, there's a possibility that Vitellius who came before him, was the first, as there is a question about his ancestry.The first Roman emperor that we definitely know was not nobility was Vespasian. However, there's a possibility that Vitellius who came before him, was the first, as there is a question about his ancestry.The first Roman emperor that we definitely know was not nobility was Vespasian. However, there's a possibility that Vitellius who came before him, was the first, as there is a question about his ancestry.The first Roman emperor that we definitely know was not nobility was Vespasian. However, there's a possibility that Vitellius who came before him, was the first, as there is a question about his ancestry.The first Roman emperor that we definitely know was not nobility was Vespasian. However, there's a possibility that Vitellius who came before him, was the first, as there is a question about his ancestry.The first Roman emperor that we definitely know was not nobility was Vespasian. However, there's a possibility that Vitellius who came before him, was the first, as there is a question about his ancestry.The first Roman emperor that we definitely know was not nobility was Vespasian. However, there's a possibility that Vitellius who came before him, was the first, as there is a question about his ancestry.
Did the roman emperor constatine have a good or bad reputation?
he was a good emperor
Was germanicus Julius Caesar a good or bad emperor?
He wasn't an emperor.
Were there once three Roman emperors at the same time?
Not at the same time, but once there were three Roman Emperors in the same year (69 A.D.) : Galba, Otho and Vitellius. Emperor Galba was in 69 AD murdered by a group of conspirators led by Otho, who then only reigned for a few months as Emperor until he was defeated by General Vitellius who had risen against him and who became the next Emperor.
Who did the Roman Emperor Nero succeed?
The year after Nero's death is known as the year of the four emperors. Technically, Galba was the one who succeeded Nero, but he didn't last long and was overthrown by Otho, who in turn was overthrown by Vitellius., who in turn was overthrown by Vespasian.
When was Vitellius born?
Vitellius was born on September 24, 15.
Was Tang Taizong a good or bad emperor?
terrible.
How did vitellius become emperor on Rome?
Vespasian became emperor by a military alliance. His own troops backed him and he also had the alliance of the Syrian troops. It was enough for him to overpower his other rivals and become emperor. The news of Galba marching on Rome, caused Vaspasian to temporarily suspend his crusade to end the revolt in Jerusalem.
How is evaluated the ruling of the roman emperor Nero?
he was good and bad
When did Vitellius die?
Vitellius died on December 22, 69 at the age of 54.
How old was Vitellius at death?
Vitellius died on December 22, 69 at the age of 54.
Was HiroHito a good leader?
Hirohito was a good Emperor that made bad desions in his life
