This is clearly a question that can only be answered on a subjective basis, because if they were not killed, no one can provide any evidence on what the impact of that would have caused. It's clear that the Russian people no longer had an allegiance to the Romanov family. Czar Nicholas had harshly crushed riots by having his soldiers fire into the crowds, killing many people, especially in the riots of 1905. An imprisonment in Siberia would in my opinion would have taken care of any return to a monarchy.
Romanovs
The Romanovs
The Romanovs ruled for 303 years in Russia.
No, far from it. Rasputin wanted to keep the Romanovs alive because he was benefiting from being a favorite of Empress Alexandra. In December 1916, Rasputin was murdered by certain members of the Russian aristocracy who disliked the fact that he had become a powerful person just because he had Alexandra's favor. In July 1918, the Romanovs were murdered by members of the secret police, the Cheka, and Red Army soldiers on orders from Vladimir Lenin.
TRUE Woah. Its all true except for one thing, the Romanovs, the royal Russian czar family upon which the idea of one of the romanovs escaping is known as the story as Anastasia. Well anyway they were killed by rebels in 1917 so it couldn't have even started till 1917 so that is false. If I'm wrong tell me. From Beatle mania 1234
The possessive form of the plural, proper noun Romanovs is Romanovs'.example: The Romanovs' dog is a prize winner.
The Romanovs - band - was created in 2003.
The Fall of the Romanovs was created on 1917-09-06.
Canonization of the Romanovs was born on 1868-05-18.
Canonization of the Romanovs died on 1918-07-17.
The Romanovs ruled Russia from 1613-1917 when they were ousted by the broadly based revolution in March of that year.
Russia.
The Bolsheviks
yes
No, the KGB was not yet in existence when the Romanovs were alive. The Romanovs did however have their own secret police.
No , they were not, they were Royalty, or Aristocrats.
Romanovs