John wasn't a bad king... he just wasn't the best off 'em all! He made everyone pay extremely high taxes and chucked all of the monks out, including the blind and crippled. John fell out with the pope allot and used to steal things from the churches, but eventually John gave in to the pope and they were like bezzy mates :) Also John used to make elderly widows pay a £3000 pound fine or he would make them remarry! But John did allot of good and hardworking things:
He had a battle for his crown and won!
On rare occasions, John would organise a large meal for poor people who haven't ate large meals a while
King John won battles against Wales, Scotland and England. He also made the navy(England's fighting ships) very strong. John made sure that trials in courts were fairer and made England richer. :)
king john was a bad king because if a man liked his wife he srangled them on his wifes bed.king john hated priests,ones a robber beat up,mugged and killed a priest when he was taken to the court he sayed " let him go he has helped me" he also gave him money!.some people say that he was a good king because he helped children and saved peoples live.do you think that king john was a good king or a bad king
He was a bad king because he didn't care about the 'magna carta' and he ruled the country in a bad way.
There's no consensus on whether King John was a good king. Many consider him to have been a bad ruler, but others think he was effective. Regardless of the presence of dissenting opinions, he tends to be portrayed negatively in the media.
People in the Victorian times disliked King John and saw him as a failure and a villain. They thought he created his own problems and was cruel and a wicked king; the Devil in disguise.
Well he stopped Catholics going to there holy church so Guy Folks tried to bomb the houses of Parliament when King John was inside!
In which country?Bad king John of England was held captive in England of course. John the Good was probably held captive in England or France.
Half.
you
He was a bad king because he didn't care about the 'magna carta' and he ruled the country in a bad way.
Character of King John: Unscrupulous, cruel, disloyal. A notorious womaniserhttp://www.middle-ages.org.uk/king-john.htm
baron thought he was such a bad king that he had to sign the magna carta
There's no consensus on whether King John was a good king. Many consider him to have been a bad ruler, but others think he was effective. Regardless of the presence of dissenting opinions, he tends to be portrayed negatively in the media.
People in the Victorian times disliked King John and saw him as a failure and a villain. They thought he created his own problems and was cruel and a wicked king; the Devil in disguise.
King John reacted poorly to the signing of the Magna Carta since it limited his powers as a king and made him adhere to a Parliament
Well he stopped Catholics going to there holy church so Guy Folks tried to bomb the houses of Parliament when King John was inside!
The monks wrote bad things about John,some even false because King John didnt like the pope and the pope didnt like him.
In which country?Bad king John of England was held captive in England of course. John the Good was probably held captive in England or France.
They said that he was a very bad king, to all of his people of England.