answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

ORDEAL BY COMBAT

Ordeal by combat could only be undertaken by nobles who could pay someone to fight for them. The nobles would fight with their accuser and the winner was innocent. Whoever lost was guilty or dead.

ORDEAL BY FIRE

Ordeal by fire had the accused holding a piece of red hot iron and walking a few paces. Another form of this involved the accused dropping a stone into a cauldron full of boiling water and getting it out with their hands.

Hands were then bandaged and left for three days. After this the bandages were removed and if the wound was healed you were innocent. If not you were guilty.

ORDEAL BY WATER

Ordeal by water had the accused tied up and thrown into a stream or lake that was previously blessed by a priest. If they floated it was said the 'holy' waters had rejected them because they were guilty. If they sank and drowned then they were proclaimed innocent.- YOU DIED EITHER WAY :P

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Trials by ordeal in the middle ages?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why was all fate decided by trial by ordeal in the middle ages?

The belief then during the Middle Ages was that he who has not done wrong will be protected by the gods and that by doing the trial by ordeal, the innocent ones would survive the ordeal as they will be protected by the gods.


When did trial by ordeal in middle ages start?

Trial by ordeal did not originate in the Middle Ages. It probably developed in prehistory, but certainly existed in the earliest historic periods. There is a link below.


What was the middle ages trial?

During the middle ages, heresy trials were called inquisitions.


When did witchcraft trials start during middle ages?

jkiipjijI:ji;jFRdbhsrgthrthnmmr


What were two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the middle ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages.?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were two method for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were two methods for deciding the guilt or the innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were the two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early Middle Ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were two methods of deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were two methods for deciding the guilt of innocence of accused criminals in the Early method ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.