This is an interpretation of the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution; better known as the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights are INDIVIDUAL rights, not the rights of your neighborhood, town, village, city, county, or state...they are personal rights of the US citizen; man, woman, or child.
No, journalists could show whatever they wanted, which contributed towards the outrage during the peace movements. Horrific images would sell the most papers.
a.) were a threat to mortality and should be censored.
Media images of the war had a significant impact on America, shaping public opinion and mobilizing support for or against military intervention. Graphic and disturbing images, such as the Vietnam War's "napalm girl" photo, contributed to growing anti-war sentiment. These images also helped fuel broader movements for peace and played a role in influencing policy decisions made by the government.
it would depend on your personal interests and the specifics of a project. War would be easier to find solid facts and images on, but road accidents would be slightly more original.
The government censored the press and banned certain films, thereby challenging any media influences that threatened the war effort. ---wish this answer could help you
No, journalists could show whatever they wanted, which contributed towards the outrage during the peace movements. Horrific images would sell the most papers.
the jews
Why not start with accurate websites. History should not be censored due to age.
has mild *CENSORED* such as *CENSORED* , *CENSORED* and *CENSORED*
No. on the other hand there is age appropriateness
a.) were a threat to mortality and should be censored.
Yes it should be censored. Because most times it can o to the extreme without truth.
National Security; the enemy has ears.
This answer has been censored for extreme stupidity. == ==
A. were a threat to morality and should be censored
Censored is the correct spelling.
because it may be offensive to some people