0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did the Roman Empire fall because of internal or external problems?
The western Roman Empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.
What was a major effect of the fall of the Roman Empire on western Europe?
One of the major causes for the Fall of Roman Empire was the Antagonism between the Senate and the Emperor
What is one social reason for the collapse of the western Roman Empire?
.
What is the thesis of the fall of rome?
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. Historians have argue for a great number of reasons or factors which led to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. Therefore, there are many theses. There are even historians who argue that this part of the Roman Empire did not fall. Instead, there was a transformation of this part of the empire into a new system of governance and culture. The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
What Roman period came after the republic?
After the fall of the Roman republic came the principate, or as it is commonly called the "empire", because the leader was the "Imperator", the one who commanded.
Did the Roman Empire fall because of internal or external problems?
The western Roman Empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.The western Roman empire fell because of a combination of both internal and external pressures. There was no one reason for the fall. The internal affairs had been in decline for years and the empire simply could not take the pressures on its borders.
What was a major effect of the fall of the Roman Empire on western Europe?
One of the major causes for the Fall of Roman Empire was the Antagonism between the Senate and the Emperor
What is one social reason for the collapse of the western Roman Empire?
.
Can you give me a sentence with the word empire in it?
There have been many books written on the Roman empire. One of the best known is "The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire" by Gibbons.
Why did Latin develop into different languages after the fall of the Roman Empire?
One of the features of the Roman empire was unity. This ranged from civil rights to the money they used. This also included the Latin language. After the fall of the empire, that unity of language...
Why do you think men fought for control of the Roman Empire?
Men fought for control of the empire for one basic reason: power.Men fought for control of the empire for one basic reason: power.Men fought for control of the empire for one basic reason: power.Men fought for control of the empire for one basic reason: power.Men fought for control of the empire for one basic reason: power.Men fought for control of the empire for one basic reason: power.Men fought for control of the empire for one basic reason: power.Men fought for control of the empire for one basic reason: power.Men fought for control of the empire for one basic reason: power.
A major effect of the decline of the roman empire was that western Europe?
One of the major causes for the Fall of Roman Empire was the Antagonism between the Senate and the Emperor
What was the Eastern Roman Empire known also as?
The Eastern Roman Empire is known as Byzantine Empire. However, this is a term which had been coined by historians. So are the term Eastern Roman Empire and Western Roman Empire. The Romans had only one term: Roman Empire. Historians use the term Byzantine Empire to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire after the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. The Romans did not use this term, they called it Roman Empire or Romania (this referred to this empire and not the country which was later called Romania). The term Byzantine is derived from Byzantium, the Greek city which was redeveloped, turned into the imperial capital of the eastern part of the Roman Empire and renamed Constantinople by emperor Constantine the Great in 330. It is used to indicate the fact that not long after the fall of the western part, this empire became centred on Greece and Greek in character after it lost most of its non-Greek territories. Greek replaced Latin as the official language of this empire in 620, some 150 years after the fall of the west
What is the thesis of the fall of rome?
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. Historians have argue for a great number of reasons or factors which led to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. Therefore, there are many theses. There are even historians who argue that this part of the Roman Empire did not fall. Instead, there was a transformation of this part of the empire into a new system of governance and culture. The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
What Roman period came after the republic?
After the fall of the Roman republic came the principate, or as it is commonly called the "empire", because the leader was the "Imperator", the one who commanded.
What is the fall of rome like?
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
What date is given for the fall of Rome?
There is no precise date for the fall of the Roman empire. The demise of the mighty civilization was a very gradual process from an abundance of factors. At one time, the empire was split in half, the eastern and western Roman empire. To best answer your question, the western Roman empire (in Europe), in which in large part has influenced the western world the most, fell in the 5th century for an appropriate estimate. Just remember: since the Roman Empire became an empire from the transition from a republic (in about B.C. 33), everything began to slide downhill. The empire itself was a major factor to Rome's fall.
