0
Is it true that Conclusions related to historical events are limited to subjective evaluation of the existing evidence?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
true
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Can you give me an example sentence with the word historical?
historical evidence suggests this theory. The war was Historical.
Why did the croatan Indians kill the the colonists of the lost colony?
It isn’t sure they did. In fact, new historical evidence points to the possibility that they lived with them. They had a village down river from the colony and recent historical evidence has found English items in the village and evidence they were living with them.
What is a sentence for the word historical?
These historical documents are of extreme importance.This is a historical site.
Why was Marie Antoinette so mean?
There is no historical evidence that she was mean spirited.
What text is valuable for gaining context about a historical event but is unreliable as evidence?
textbook
Is it true conclusions related to historical events are limited to subjective evaluation of the existing evidence?
true
True or false Conclusions related to historical events are limited to evaluating the existing evidence?
True. Conclusions related to historical events are based on evaluating existing evidence such as documents, artifacts, and eyewitness accounts. These conclusions are subject to change as new evidence is discovered or alternative interpretations are considered.
What is difference between subjective evaluation and objective evaluation?
Subjective evaluation is based on personal opinions, feelings, or interpretations, which can vary from person to person. Objective evaluation, on the other hand, relies on measurable criteria and facts that can be observed and verified. Subjective evaluations may be influenced by biases and emotions, while objective evaluations aim to be unbiased and rely on concrete evidence.
Conclusions related to historical events are limited to evaluating the existing evidence. True False?
True
What evidence is always subject to each individual's data?
An individual's perception and interpretation of evidence is always subjective and can vary based on personal beliefs, biases, and experiences. This subjectivity can influence how the evidence is understood and the conclusions drawn from it.
What strategies do historians use to synthesis evidence and draw conclusions?
Historians use a combination of critical analysis, cross-referencing multiple sources, identifying patterns, and considering various perspectives to synthesize evidence and draw conclusions. They also employ historical context, empathy for historical actors, and theoretical frameworks to interpret the evidence in a meaningful way. Collaboration with other historians and subject matter experts can also help to validate findings and conclusions.
Historical thinking skills can be divided into three main processes asking questions and drawing conclusions.?
Historical thinking skills involve analyzing evidence, constructing arguments based on that evidence, and interpreting historical events within their context. By asking critical questions, making connections between events, and drawing well-supported conclusions, historians can gain a deeper understanding of the past.
What is subjective judgment?
Subjective judgment is an evaluation or opinion that is based on personal feelings, interpretations, or experiences, rather than on objective facts or evidence. It is influenced by individual perspectives and biases, and may vary from person to person.
How are scientific evidence and scientific conclusions related?
Scientific conclusions are based on scientific evidence.
What is the difference between subjective and objective feedback?
Subjective feedback is based on personal opinions or feelings, while objective feedback is based on observable facts or data. Subjective feedback is influenced by individual biases and perspectives, while objective feedback provides a more impartial evaluation based on evidence.
How do two kinds of scientific reasoning differ?
objective means that you make decisions and draw conclusions based on evidence, subjective means that personal feelings have entered into a decison or conclusion.
What does you do historians use to synthesize evidence and draw conclusions?
Historians use various sources of evidence such as primary documents, secondary sources, artifacts, and personal accounts to synthesize information. They analyze these sources critically to develop historical interpretations and draw conclusions about the past. By comparing and contrasting different sources, historians construct a coherent narrative to present a comprehensive understanding of historical events.
