Wiki User
∙ 12y agoThe king and Queen of Spain sent Columbus to America. The Spanish Government controlled The Spanish Colonies until they overthrew Spanish rule. The colonies existed for the benefit of Spain. Very little benefit accrued to the conquered. The French mainly existed to provide furs for France. In Haiti, a plantation owner wanted to make his money and return to France as fast as possible. He had no desire to remain there and develop the land. The French in Canada preferred the English Rulers during the American Revolution and fought against an American Army sent to Canada. They refused an offer from a French Army to become a part of France again. The Dutch ruled New York for a brief period of time.
Private enterprise or corporations and not the government sent the British colonies to America. Both the investors in England and the colonists had a financial interest in the success of the colony. They worked to make it a success. They also had English Law working for them. When an English Army conquered New York, the Dutch settlers preferred living under English Law to Dutch Law. They fought against a Dutch Army sent to reconquer them.
The English Colonies also had either partial or full self government. The others did not. This helped keep foreign tyranny at bay.
Of course trouble came in 1763 when King George III decided to change things.
French and Spanish colonies pretty much only existed for the 'home lands'. The colonies provided furs and other raw product.
On the other hand the English colonies had a tad bit more freedom. Although they still were 'guinea pigs' for the home land...
~Lexy Lynch
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoFrance exercised more direct control over its African colonies.
There were several differences, but the clearest is that French colonial rule was direct from the Paris while British colonial rule preferred to leave amenable local leaders in charge.
did the British began stationing regular British troops at the center of colonial resistance: Philadelphia
The British colonial Empire had the largest colonial extent of all countries. It owned colonies on every continent, of course leaving out Antarctica.
the colonial system is when the British wanted to make the colonies self-sufficient and they were in a competition to see who can get the most gold.
France exercised more direct control over its African colonies.
There were several differences, but the clearest is that French colonial rule was direct from the Paris while British colonial rule preferred to leave amenable local leaders in charge.
There were several differences, but the clearest is that French colonial rule was direct from the Paris while British colonial rule preferred to leave amenable local leaders in charge.
George Washington was in the British army during the French and Indian War. That gave him the experience he needed to command the Colonial army against the British,
they had a lot of problems because of the differences they had. for example, their religion was different, they liked diffenrent styles and so on.
deep-seated differences in military discipline emerged between the British officers and the American colonial troops
The British were formal, had fancy weapons, lots of Experience, and wore uniforms. The Patriots ( us ) wore rags, and had less experience, but had better strategies. The british fought in lines and with bayonets, the Patriots didn't
Yes, "British colonial policy" should be capitalized because it is a proper noun referring to a specific policy enacted by the British government during its colonial period.
Colonial, British general John Burgoyne surrendered
British Colonial Hilton Nassau was created in 1901.
Colonial militia chased the British to Boston.
Colonial