0
In the space provided compare and contrast the Puritan governments of Massachusetts and Connecticut. Evaluate the effectiveness of each form of government as well as the lasting impact each had on Ame?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
The Puritan government of Massachusetts was not a democracy or a theocracy. Massachusetts had views of both. The religious laws were prevalent over most laws in the state. However, they didn't have one ruler. The only people who could vote were the freemen's. The Puritan government of Connecticut was controlled by King Charles II of England. He gave the governor the executive power. Puritan was the only religion allowed. It was part of an extended monarchy as well.
Anonymous
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did Thomas Hooker settle in Connecticut?
Thomas Hooker founded Connecticut because he and the Puritans where unhappy with the government in Massachusetts, or how the Separitists where running it. So, Hooker and 100 other Separitists from Massachusetts and settled in What is now Connecticut.- Jomarie from CTand ben from ct
Thomas hooker left Massachusetts Bay Colony and founded Connecticut so that his followers could have a voice in government?
Type your answer here... Yes, and also because he thought that the church was getting too powerful in Massachusetts Bay, so he took 100 settlers and went south to find Connecticut.
How was government in new England different from that in New York?
One way that they are different is that the word New England is different than the word New York.
What form of government did the Connecticut Colony have?
what was the type of government in connecticut in 1635
What is the effectiveness of Japan's Government?
Japan's government is a constitutional monarchy. As of 2013, Japan has a government effectiveness rating of 94 percent, according to various worldwide studies and in comparison to other countries.
Why did puritans from Massachusetts found Connecticut?
it is because they felt the Massachusetts government was too powerful
Connecticut government in the 1600s?
Assembly members from Massachusetts were chosen to rule Connecticut.
Why did the Puritan's find Connecticut?
they felt that the Massachusetts government had to much power
Did Massachusetts bay and Connecticut colonies government were controlled by the landholding aristocracy?
no they wernt
Why did Thomas Hooker settle in Connecticut?
Thomas Hooker founded Connecticut because he and the Puritans where unhappy with the government in Massachusetts, or how the Separitists where running it. So, Hooker and 100 other Separitists from Massachusetts and settled in What is now Connecticut.- Jomarie from CTand ben from ct
How were the voting rules different in Connecticut and in Massachusetts bay colony?
Massachusetts Bay colony was ruled by a governor while Connecticut had an adopted plan of union called the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut, a written constitution, or plan of government. -by someone else who had this for homework ;3
How was its government of Rhode Island different from those of Massachusetts and Connecticut?
so far no one knows! but u should! HAHAHA!!
Thomas hooker left Massachusetts Bay Colony and founded Connecticut so that his followers could have a voice in government?
Type your answer here... Yes, and also because he thought that the church was getting too powerful in Massachusetts Bay, so he took 100 settlers and went south to find Connecticut.
How was government in new England different from that in New York?
One way that they are different is that the word New England is different than the word New York.
What type of colonial government does Connecticut have?
The Connecticut Colonies had Self government.
What is the effectiveness of government regulation in controlling markets?
Appraise the effectiveness of government regulation in controlling markets
What was the colonists reaction to the townshed acts?
The Massachusetts Government Act created even more outrage than the Port Act because it unilaterally altered the government of Massachusetts to bring it under control of the British government. Under the terms of the Government Act, almost all positions in the colonial government were to be appointed by the governor or the king. The act also severely limited the activities of town meetings in Massachusetts. Colonists outside Massachusetts feared that their governments could now also be changed by the legislative fiat of Parliament.
