In the prime years of the Roman Republic, a case can be made for the Senate making most of the political decisions.
The Roman Republic was a form of government in ancient Rome where elected officials represented the people and made decisions on their behalf. Canadian democracy, on the other hand, is a modern system where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf in a parliamentary system. The key difference lies in the time period, structure of government, and societal norms that shaped each system.
In Greece democracy meant power by the people. In democratic Athens the citizens gathered in the assembly of the people made all the decisions and voted on laws. The executive was there to carry out the will of the people. The Roman Republic instead was an oligarchy. Although the people could vote on laws and elect the officers of state, the most powerful political body was the senate, whose senators were not elected and were members of the oligarchy.
Each had assemblies of the citizens which made decisions on significant issues, which decisions were implemented by the council/senate.
You need to specify what was made if you want to make it possible to answer your question.
Those enacted by the assemblies of the citizens.
made policy decisions
the senate
Roman society was divided into the patricians (the aristocracy), the equites (equestrians) who were bankers, money lenders, merchants and investors in shipping and mining, and the plebeians (the commoners). there were also slaves and freedmen
The Roman Republic was a form of government in ancient Rome where elected officials represented the people and made decisions on their behalf. Canadian democracy, on the other hand, is a modern system where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf in a parliamentary system. The key difference lies in the time period, structure of government, and societal norms that shaped each system.
In Greece democracy meant power by the people. In democratic Athens the citizens gathered in the assembly of the people made all the decisions and voted on laws. The executive was there to carry out the will of the people. The Roman Republic instead was an oligarchy. Although the people could vote on laws and elect the officers of state, the most powerful political body was the senate, whose senators were not elected and were members of the oligarchy.
Fair is a flexible word. Both democracies had their good and bad points. But i both, the assemblies of the citizens made decisions carried out by the Senate/Council. Sometimes bad decisions were made, and the citizens brought 'unfairness' on themselves.
The Roman republic was established to rid the people of a one man rule. They preferred to be governed by a consensus.
Each had assemblies of the citizens which made decisions on significant issues, which decisions were implemented by the council/senate.
The legislative body in ancient Rome used to be called the Roman Senate. It was responsible for making laws and decisions that governed the Roman Republic. The Senate was made up of Roman aristocrats and served as an advisory council to the consuls, who were elected leaders of Rome.
The government of the Roman Republic.
In my opinion, as much as possible.
it made it because it was ruled by a penis leader