In countries that are lead by one or a few powerful families (like the countries on the Arab peninsula) leaders are either chosen by cooptation, where the family or clan members have a meeting to decide who to ask or appoint for the job; or they are simply appointed by the head of the family, like in Saudi Arabia.
a meeting of members or leaders or a political party tomake plans,choose candidates,or decide how to vote a meeting of members or leaders or a political party tomake plans,choose candidates,or decide how to vote
The viking leaders wee chosen when they completed a raid and wee successful
it was a nonsense word that meant nothing
They were 'government by foreigners' which is not meritocracy or aristocracy.
Mostly because the leaders thought about the future of numerals like say 36 has eventually grown into somthing like 69 which is obviously much more useful.
No because they were the rich and could do whatever they wanted.
Renaissance leaders were elected from various guilds in a city or from the aristocracy. This meant that the leader of a city could be anybody.
They choose their leaders according to their bodies size.
Elections.
Yes, they do. Democracy countries has their citizens vote their leaders.
Enlightenment thinkers believed people should choose their own leaders.
Yes, they do. Democracy countries has their citizens vote their leaders.
By adult franchise.
because bad leaders would lead badly
They were called the samuri, and they were a Japanese warrior caste which provided the administrative and fighting aristocracy from the 11th to the 19th centuries.
They don't, it's royal blood.
No, these houses (Legislative Branch) choose their own leaders.