answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Peasants were treated badly like slaves (they can be classed as slaves)

-----

Peasants were mostly serfs, who were not entirely free, but many medieval peasants were yeomen or cottars, who were free. There were also some slaves in Europe, but the general tendency reduced the number in time because they were freed.

The serfs, who were the majority of the peasants, pretty much organized themselves. They paid rent, in the form of labor, part of the crop or money. In return for this they were guaranteed a job, a home, and protection from crime, war, and famine. It was a two way deal, in which they had rights and duties, and so did the lord on whose land they lived.

The reason serfs were not entirely free was that they were not legally allowed to leave the land. But even that was a two way thing. The lord was not allowed to evict them either, unless there was good reason, such as not paying rent.

There is a link below to an article describing this.

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 13y ago

English peasants were treated a good deal better than many people would have you believe.

Most peasants in medieval England were serfs - some were freemen. Slave trade was made illegal by King William I, the Conqueror, and slavery was abolished by King Henry I.

Serfs were not slaves. They were legally tied to the land where they lived, and they could not legally move away, but they also could not be made to move by their lords. In earlier times they gave their lords service, instead of rent, and the amount of time was usually one or two days per week. They also worked on common fields for some time per week, and they had land allocated to them for their own use. The organization and allocation was done by a reeve, who was also a serf, and in many cases the reeve was elected by the serfs. In later times, the obligation of the serfs often came down to a money payment for rent. The lords were obliged to protect the serfs. Historians disagree over whether the serfs were obliged to serve military duty.

Freemen owned their own land, but they had obligations they owed to the king for this, including military service. The military duty of the freeman was usually to be an archer, which is why a yeoman is one who works hard or an archer. The English archers were a formidable military group, who could destroy charging knights from hundreds of yards away, in good conditions. They were respected and the lords were not interested in alienating them. A freeman could lose his property if he owed money or otherwise got into trouble, and his life was not as secure as the life of a serf.

There were times when a serf who decided to move off the manor where he lived would be declared free, if he was gone for over a year. There were also communities where no one could be arrested for being a runaway serf - this was enacted by kings who wanted certain communities to grow for one reason or another. Clearly most serfs did not run away - at least not before the Black Death. One important reason for this was that in running away, a serf lost the security of having a guarantee of work and a place to live on the manor.

Contrary to one widely held view, serfs did not need permission of the lord to marry, and marriage did not require a church service of any kind. Church marriages were for the rich or titled people, until the renaissance. Prior to that, a couple would exchange vows, possibly without any witness, and announce the fact they had done this. Marriages were often registered in the church registries, but this was not technically a requirement.

Punishments for crimes were not the same for serfs as they were for wealthier or more important people. The idea that English punishments were cruel is mostly because of accounts of people found guilty of treason, and serfs, in general, were too unimportant even to be able to commit this offense. Their punishments for most crimes were decided by local courts, in which it was sometimes possible for a person to be acquitted of the crime because he could get a dozen people to swear they thought he was innocent. Witch trials and such things were virtually unheard of until the Renaissance.

During the Middle Ages, times were hard. People were often undernourished and had to work hard. Weather, disease, and pests could all wipe out crops. Effective treatment for diseases was not known. A wise lord had good reasons to attend to the well being of the serfs who lived on his land, since his wealth depended on their products. A serf's life was not easy, but the greatest difficulties were probably not in the ways they were treated.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How were the peasants treated?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How were peasants treated during Louis xiv reign?

Peasants were treated like they were trash. Just thrown out there, not a big deal. They didnt have anything to eat


Why did serfs and peasants get treated unfairly in the middle ages?

Because they were


Why were peasants treated badly?

because they were low class and poor


How would peasants be treated?

Lots of people say very harshly so they treated them very harshly


Polish peasants treated in the eighteen century?

Eighteen century peasants in Poland were poor and had very few rights if any at all. European powers such as Prussia, Russia and France entered Poland and abused the peasant populations. This was true for most European peasants for several hundred years.


Why do you think egyptians were peaceful people?

becuz they treated peasants and slaves as fairly as possible


How did the peasants live during the time of the peasants revolt?

They suffered a lot of pain and acted as slaves most of the time. They had NO money and could not afford any good clothes. Peasants were treated poorly and didn't have enough to eat. It was very hard and sad.


How were the peasants treated with Tsar nicholas ll?

Peasants during Tsar Nicholas II's reign were generally treated poorly. They faced harsh conditions, poverty, and oppression under his rule. The failure to address their needs and grievances contributed to the discontent that eventually led to the Russian Revolution.


How were the peasants in china treated by the communist party during the long march?

Very well... read about the 14 points


Socialization in Elizabethan period?

well what i have heard is that the nobles got treated way better that the peasants


What is the peasent revolt?

The peasants revolt was when the peasants got tired of how they were treated. They all got together and marched to London killing anybody who got in there way. When they got to London they stood outside Westminster abby.


How were the Peasants hypocrites in Tale of Two Cities?

The French peasants revolted against the aristocracy for the reason that the aristocracy did not care for the lower class and treated them badly. During the revolution, the upper and lower classes reversed roles, as the peasants tried to crush the aristocrats by capturing them and sending them to death by La Guillotine.