0
Initially, the Burke and Wills expedition was made up of 30 men (including four Afghan camel drivers), 27 camels and 23 horses.
The party was first split at Menindee, and then again at Cooper Creek. Burke and Wills crossed to the north with just two other men, Charles Gray and John King.
Other people on the Burke and Wills expedition included:
- George Landells
- Dr Ludwig Becker
- Dr Hermann Beckler
- William Wright
- Charles Ferguson
- Owen Cowen
- William Brahe
- Henry Creber
- Robert Fletcher
- Thomas McDonough
- William Patten
- Patrick Langan
- John Drakeford
- James McIlwaine
- James Lane
- Brookes
- John Polongeaux
- Robert Bowman
- William Purcell
- John Smith
- Charles Stone
- Thomas Elliot
- Georg von Neumayer
- William Hodgkinson
- Trooper Lyons
- Alexander McPherson
Camel sepoys included:
- Samla
- Dost Mahomet
- Essau Khan
- Beloot
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who went on the exploration of Burke and Wills?
This exploration was led by Robert O'Hara Burke and William John Wills. Accompanying them on their trek to the Gulf was John King and Charlie Gray.Other members of the Burke and Wills expedition included:George LandellsDr Ludwig BeckerDr Hernmann BecklerWilliam WrightCharles FergusonOwen CowenWilliam BraheHenry CreberRobert FletcherThomas McDonoughWilliam PattenPatrick LanganJohn DrakefordJames McIlwaineJames LaneBrookesJohn PolongeauxRobert BowmanWilliam PurcellJohn SmithCharles StoneThomas ElliotGeorg von NeumayerWilliam HodgkinsonTrooper LyonsAlexander McPhersonCamel sepoys included:SamlaDost MahometEssau KhanBeloot
What problems did Burke and Wills encounter?
The exploration of Burke and Wills was fraught with problems. Burke and Wills led Australia's best-equipped and most expensive exploration expedition. With such preparation behind them, they should not have died - but Burke was impatient, and it was this very human quality that essentially resulted in their premature deaths. Robert O'Hara Burke, with William Wills later appointed second-in-command, led the expedition to try to cross Australia from south to north and back again. The exploration party was very well equipped, and subsequently very large. Because of its size, the exploration party was split at Menindee so that Burke could push ahead to the Gulf of Carpentaria with a smaller party. Splitting the part was a fatal mistake. The smaller group went on ahead to establish the depot at Cooper Creek which would serve to offer the necessary provisions for when the men returned from the Gulf. After several unsuccessful forays into the northern dry country from Cooper Creek, Burke decided to push on ahead to the Gulf in December 1860, regardless of the risks - and the intense summer heat. He took with him Wills, Charles Gray and John King. The expedition to the Gulf took longer than Burke anticipated: upon his return to Cooper Creek, he found that the relief party had left just seven hours earlier, less than the amount of time it had taken to bury Gray, who had died on the return journey. Gray died from starvation, and from being abused and badly beaten by Burke when he was found stealing food. Through poor judgement, lack of observation and a series of miscommunications, Burke and Wills never met up with the relief party. They perished on the banks of Cooper Creek. Burke died on or around 30 June 1861. King alone survived to lead the rescue party to the remains of Burke and Wills, and the failure of one of the most elaborately planned expeditions in Australia's history. The exact cause of Burke and Wills's death was not starvation or malnutrition, but inadvertent poisoning. The men knew that the Aborigines gathered nardoo which they had used to sustain Burke and Wills, until they were frightened off by Burke's defensiveness against the Aborigines. So, whilst awaiting the rescue that never came, Burke and Wills made their way to where they knew Aborigines collected Nardoo. Nardoo was an important bush food for Aborigines, who knew how to prepare its seedpods (or, strictly speaking, sporocaps) to make flour. The sporocarps contain poisons that must first be removed for them to be eaten safely. Studies of the explorers' journals indicate that they probably died of nardoo poisoning, after failing to follow precautions from the Aborigines of how to prepare it safely.
Were Burke and Wills heroes of exploration?
Yes, in an Australian traditional sense they were, two blokes going against the odds but seeking adventure and fame. From a historian's perspective they were heroic to attempt the task but ill prepared for what lay ahead of them. They were Australia's Scott of the Antarctica. Another opinion: It is not strictly accurate to say Burke and Wills were ill prepared. Their expedition was the largest and most well-equipped of any Australian exploration party. Burke could hardly be considered a hero of exploration: he was ill-tempered and impatient, traits which had a great deal of influence on the tragic outcome of the exploration. Also, he did not seek adventure and fame. His motivation was primarily to impress the girl he wished to marry, who promised she would marry him if he went on the journey. Wills, on the other hand, could be regarded as a hero of exploration. He did not have Burke's arrogance or impatience. He had more of a scientific interest in the exploration and sought to follow the orders of the colonial government in Victoria. He sought to hold the exploration party together where Burke's interest was to complete the task as quickly as possible, at the expense of good judgement.
Were Burke and Wills heroes?
In some ways, Australian explorers Burke and Wills could be regarded as heroes. They were persistent and determined, both hallmarks of a hero. They endured a massive trek across the continent in horrific conditions, and gave their absolute best for their mission.Burke was perhaps less of a hero: he was ill-tempered and impatient, traits which had a great deal of influence on the tragic outcome of the exploration. His motivation for exploring was primarily to impress the girl he wished to marry, who promised she would marry him if he went on the journey.Wills, on the other hand, could be regarded as a hero. He did not have Burke's arrogance or impatience. He had more of a scientific interest in the exploration and sought to follow the orders of the colonial government in Victoria. He sought to hold the exploration party together where Burke's interest was to complete the task as quickly as possible, at the expense of good judgement.
How many people went on Amerigo Vespucci's voyage?
75 thousand people
What are some details about Burke and wills life?
They went on a expedition together for money/gold
Who went on the exploration of Burke and Wills?
This exploration was led by Robert O'Hara Burke and William John Wills. Accompanying them on their trek to the Gulf was John King and Charlie Gray.Other members of the Burke and Wills expedition included:George LandellsDr Ludwig BeckerDr Hernmann BecklerWilliam WrightCharles FergusonOwen CowenWilliam BraheHenry CreberRobert FletcherThomas McDonoughWilliam PattenPatrick LanganJohn DrakefordJames McIlwaineJames LaneBrookesJohn PolongeauxRobert BowmanWilliam PurcellJohn SmithCharles StoneThomas ElliotGeorg von NeumayerWilliam HodgkinsonTrooper LyonsAlexander McPhersonCamel sepoys included:SamlaDost MahometEssau KhanBeloot
Who was the only survivor from the Burke and Wills expedition?
The only survivor from the Burke and Wills expedition was John King. There were actually several dozen survivors, but the others did not make the arduous trek to the Gulf of Carpentaria. King was the only one of the four who went to the Gulf and back who survived.
What nicknames did Clarence Burke go by?
Clarence Burke went by Jonnie.
What were Burke and Wills' problems while traveling?
The expedition of Burke and Wills met with many problems. The Burke and Wills expedition was Australia's best-equipped and most expensive exploration. With such preparation behind them, they should not have died - but Burke was impatient, and it was this very human quality that caused a problem and essentially resulted in their premature deaths. Robert O'Hara Burke, with William Wills later appointed second-in-command, led the expedition to try to cross Australia from south to north and back again. The exploration party was very well equipped, and subsequently very large. Because of its size, the exploration party was split at Menindee so that Burke could push ahead to the Gulf of Carpentaria with a smaller party. Splitting the part was a fatal mistake. The smaller group went on ahead to establish the depot at Cooper Creek which would serve to offer the necessary provisions for when the men returned from the Gulf. After several unsuccessful forays into the northern dry country from Cooper Creek, Burke decided to push on ahead to the Gulf in December 1860, regardless of the risks - and the intense summer heat. He took with him Wills, Charles Gray and John King. The expedition to the Gulf took longer than Burke anticipated: upon his return to Cooper Creek, he found that the relief party had left just seven hours earlier, less than the amount of time it had taken to bury Gray, who had died on the return journey. Gray died from starvation, and from being abused and badly beaten by Burke when he was found stealing food. Through poor judgement, lack of observation and a series of miscommunications, Burke and Wills never met up with the relief party. They perished on the banks of Cooper Creek. Burke died on or around 30 June 1861. King alone survived to lead the rescue party to the remains of Burke and Wills, and the failure of one of the most elaborately planned expeditions in Australia's history. The exact cause of Burke and Wills's death was not starvation or malnutrition, but inadvertent poisoning. The men knew that the Aborigines gathered nardoo which they had used to sustain Burke and Wills, until they were frightened off by Burke's defensiveness against the Aborigines. So, whilst awaiting the rescue that never came, Burke and Wills made their way to where they knew Aborigines collected Nardoo. Nardoo was an important bush food for Aborigines, who knew how to prepare its seedpods (or, strictly speaking, sporocaps) to make flour. The sporocarps contain poisons that must first be removed for them to be eaten safely. Studies of the explorers' journals indicate that they probably died of nardoo poisoning, after failing to follow precautions from the Aborigines of how to prepare it safely.
Why do people think Burke And Wills Should never have died?
Burke and Wills led Australia's best-equipped and most expensive exploration expedition. With such preparation behind them, they should not have died - but Burke was impatient, and it was this very human quality that essentially resulted in their premature deaths. Robert O'Hara Burke, with William Wills later appointed second-in-command, led the expedition to try to cross Australia from south to north and back again. They set out from Melbourne in August 1860, farewelled by around 15,000 people. The exploration party was very well equipped, and subsequently very large. Because of its size, the exploration party was split at Menindee so that Burke could push ahead to the Gulf of Carpentaria with a smaller party. Splitting the part was a fatal mistake. The smaller group went on ahead to establish the depot at Cooper Creek which would serve to offer the necessary provisions for when the men returned from the Gulf. After several unsuccessful forays into the northern dry country from Cooper Creek, Burke decided to push on ahead to the Gulf in December 1860, regardless of the risks - and the intense summer heat. He took with him Wills, Charles Gray and John King. The expedition to the Gulf took longer than Burke anticipated: upon his return to Cooper Creek, he found that the relief party had left just seven hours earlier, less than the amount of time it had taken to bury Gray, who had died on the return journey. Gray died from starvation, and from being abused and badly beaten by Burke when he was found stealing food. Through poor judgement, lack of observation and a series of miscommunications, Burke and Wills never met up with the relief party. They perished on the banks of Cooper Creek. Burke died on or around 30 June 1861. King alone survived to lead the rescue party to the remains of Burke and Wills, and the failure of one of the most elaborately planned expeditions in Australia's history.
What nicknames did Frankie Burke go by?
Frankie Burke went by Brooklyn Red, and The Earl of Warwick.
What problems did Burke and Wills encounter?
The exploration of Burke and Wills was fraught with problems. Burke and Wills led Australia's best-equipped and most expensive exploration expedition. With such preparation behind them, they should not have died - but Burke was impatient, and it was this very human quality that essentially resulted in their premature deaths. Robert O'Hara Burke, with William Wills later appointed second-in-command, led the expedition to try to cross Australia from south to north and back again. The exploration party was very well equipped, and subsequently very large. Because of its size, the exploration party was split at Menindee so that Burke could push ahead to the Gulf of Carpentaria with a smaller party. Splitting the part was a fatal mistake. The smaller group went on ahead to establish the depot at Cooper Creek which would serve to offer the necessary provisions for when the men returned from the Gulf. After several unsuccessful forays into the northern dry country from Cooper Creek, Burke decided to push on ahead to the Gulf in December 1860, regardless of the risks - and the intense summer heat. He took with him Wills, Charles Gray and John King. The expedition to the Gulf took longer than Burke anticipated: upon his return to Cooper Creek, he found that the relief party had left just seven hours earlier, less than the amount of time it had taken to bury Gray, who had died on the return journey. Gray died from starvation, and from being abused and badly beaten by Burke when he was found stealing food. Through poor judgement, lack of observation and a series of miscommunications, Burke and Wills never met up with the relief party. They perished on the banks of Cooper Creek. Burke died on or around 30 June 1861. King alone survived to lead the rescue party to the remains of Burke and Wills, and the failure of one of the most elaborately planned expeditions in Australia's history. The exact cause of Burke and Wills's death was not starvation or malnutrition, but inadvertent poisoning. The men knew that the Aborigines gathered nardoo which they had used to sustain Burke and Wills, until they were frightened off by Burke's defensiveness against the Aborigines. So, whilst awaiting the rescue that never came, Burke and Wills made their way to where they knew Aborigines collected Nardoo. Nardoo was an important bush food for Aborigines, who knew how to prepare its seedpods (or, strictly speaking, sporocaps) to make flour. The sporocarps contain poisons that must first be removed for them to be eaten safely. Studies of the explorers' journals indicate that they probably died of nardoo poisoning, after failing to follow precautions from the Aborigines of how to prepare it safely.
What nicknames did Solomon Burke go by?
Solomon Burke went by The Bishop of Soul, and The King of Rock and Soul.
Were Burke and Wills heroes of exploration?
Yes, in an Australian traditional sense they were, two blokes going against the odds but seeking adventure and fame. From a historian's perspective they were heroic to attempt the task but ill prepared for what lay ahead of them. They were Australia's Scott of the Antarctica. Another opinion: It is not strictly accurate to say Burke and Wills were ill prepared. Their expedition was the largest and most well-equipped of any Australian exploration party. Burke could hardly be considered a hero of exploration: he was ill-tempered and impatient, traits which had a great deal of influence on the tragic outcome of the exploration. Also, he did not seek adventure and fame. His motivation was primarily to impress the girl he wished to marry, who promised she would marry him if he went on the journey. Wills, on the other hand, could be regarded as a hero of exploration. He did not have Burke's arrogance or impatience. He had more of a scientific interest in the exploration and sought to follow the orders of the colonial government in Victoria. He sought to hold the exploration party together where Burke's interest was to complete the task as quickly as possible, at the expense of good judgement.
Were Burke and Wills heroes?
In some ways, Australian explorers Burke and Wills could be regarded as heroes. They were persistent and determined, both hallmarks of a hero. They endured a massive trek across the continent in horrific conditions, and gave their absolute best for their mission.Burke was perhaps less of a hero: he was ill-tempered and impatient, traits which had a great deal of influence on the tragic outcome of the exploration. His motivation for exploring was primarily to impress the girl he wished to marry, who promised she would marry him if he went on the journey.Wills, on the other hand, could be regarded as a hero. He did not have Burke's arrogance or impatience. He had more of a scientific interest in the exploration and sought to follow the orders of the colonial government in Victoria. He sought to hold the exploration party together where Burke's interest was to complete the task as quickly as possible, at the expense of good judgement.
How many people went to prison in the bible?
how many people went to prison in the bible
