means the judge, or attorneys do not have enough information to continue.
Freedom of SpeechRight to bear armsQuartering ActUnreasonable searches and seizureRight to Remain SilentRight to a speedy, public, and fair trialRight to a trial by Jury
I will tell you why, because it was supported by the law and it was at the advantage of white people over non-white people!
Joe Theismann, quarterback for the Washington Redskins, was the last non-kicker or punter to wear a single-bar facemask. His last game was on November 18, 1985.
wilt chamberlain
If there is a non-jury trial then no jury is ever chosen or convened. The entire case is heard by a judge who will then render a verdict.
civil lawsuits are heard by a jury, then they make the decision. only if both parties agree to a non-jury trial does a judge make the decision.
He becomes the "Trier of Fact."AnswerIn a non-jury trial the judge has two roles.The "finder of fact" parallels the role of the jury. A judge's other role is to determine what the applicable law is and then apply the law to the facts.
The option to a jury trial is called a "bench trial." This is where a judge hears the evidence and decides without a jury. In criminal cases, the defense almost always prefers a jury trial because you only have to convince one of the jury members to avoid a conviction. Judges may be seen as less susceptible to using sympathy for a "victim" to convict than a jury. Also, if the case is more about some complex legal issue than the facts, a judge is more likely to understand the defense and find a defendant not guilty. In civil cases, a non- jury trial is better for the party that believes the law is on their side, and the jury trial is better suited for the party that hopes to confuse the jury and win based on other factors. A final consideration is cost. Non-jury trials are much shorter and therefore less expensive.
means the judge, or attorneys do not have enough information to continue.
Guilt is determined IF the prosecution can present evidence to convince a jury (or in the case of a non-jury trial, a judge) beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.
In US District courts - either the presiding Federal Judge (if a non-jury trial) or a federal jury impaneled to hear the case.
Technically, the jury renders the verdict in a jury trial, then the judge signs the written judgment based on the verdict. If the case is tried without a jury (a bench trial) the judge as the finder of fact renders the verdict and signs the appropriate written judgment.Additional: If the questioner is asking who it is that actually delivers (i.e.: first speaks) the verdict out loud; as stated above, in a bench trial the judge will deliver it, but in jury trials it can vary depending on the practice of the court and jurisdiction in which it is located. In some courts the jury foreperson will deliver the verdict, while in others the foreperson surrenders the verdict sheet to the Bailiff who delivers it to the judge who reads it and then hands it to the Court Clerk to actually be read aloud into the record .
Summary jury trial involves time limits on presentations. Each party has a limited amount of time to present their case to a mock jury, after which the jury provides a non-binding verdict. This process is typically used to encourage settlement negotiations.
Non-Citizens. However, others can be "challenged" by the prosecution and defense attorneys during voire dire.
The Magna Carta limited the king's power by no taxation without representation, allowed for fair and non excessive punishment, and a trial by jury.
the judge doesn't decide jury or non jury the defendant (person being sued) can decide to have a jury in any civil case (one person suing another) involving more than $25, or in any criminal case (the government vs a person). also, in some criminal cases (like murder) they have to have a jury trial.