answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

They fought each other and huti brought slaves to fight and tutsi was unable to fight so in modern, it's about some governmentary arguments or conflicts over situations th included ethnic groups.

User Avatar

Elizabeth Roberts

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How is the modern conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi a result of actions of the European rulers?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How is modern conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi a result of the actions of European rulers?

They fought each other and huti brought slaves to fight and tutsi was unable to fight so in modern, it's about some governmentary arguments or conflicts over situations th included ethnic groups.


How is the modern conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi a result of the actions of European rulers?

They fought each other and huti brought slaves to fight and tutsi was unable to fight so in modern, it's about some governmentary arguments or conflicts over situations th included ethnic groups.


How is the conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi a result of the actions of European?

They fought each other and huti brought slaves to fight and tutsi was unable to fight so in modern, it's about some governmentary arguments or conflicts over situations th included ethnic groups.


In the crucible The conflict between witches and Christians is compared to what modern conflict?

communism vs. capitalism


What was the Abraham-Israel conflict?

There is no such conflict. Abraham and his grandson Israel were never in conflict according to the Bible. There is also no conflict between the patriarch Abraham and the Modern State of Israel.


How have people used nationalism as a basis for their actions?

People have used nationalism to justify actions such as war, colonization, and discrimination against others deemed as outsiders. Nationalism can foster a sense of unity and pride among a group, but it can also lead to conflict and division when taken to extremes. It has been used as a tool to rally support for particular political agendas and ideologies throughout history.


Which philosopher believed that there did not have to be a conflict between the ancient classics?

Leo Strauss believed that there did not have to be a conflict between the ancient classics and modern thought. He argued that modern society could benefit from revisiting and engaging with the wisdom found in the works of classical philosophers.


In the conflict between the catholics and protestants in Ireland What are the modern consequences?

It was not over religion, do research.


How is the modern conflict between the Hutu and Tutsi a result of the action of European rulers?

They fought each other and huti brought slaves to fight and tutsi was unable to fight so in modern, it's about some governmentary arguments or conflicts over situations th included ethnic groups.


European rulers between 800 and 1500 turned to?

European rulers between 800 and 1500 turned to knights to fight their battles for them. Modern armies emerged after 1500.


What was the moral lesson of woodcutter?

The main conflict seems to be between fantasy and reality, but also there is a conflict between youth vs age, and a conflict between caring about your food and eating it (which perhaps reflects the modern day conflict between caring about animal cruelty but still using animals for food).


What did the rapid expansion of European colonialism have between the 17Th and 19Th centuries?

It laid the foundations for the beginning of a modern global economy.