0
The Roman army used discipline to punish a soldier for some infraction of a rule or some disobedience of a order. Discipline in the ancient armies was used for the same reasons/purposes as discipline in a modern army.
The above is true but I believe the total intent of the question does not delegate itself to the full definition of the word discipline. Of course all human endeavors require discipline. This serves from using discipline for a trainig regimen to gain personal good health to personal disciplined method of practice to become the number one player in tennis as example.
At its peak the Roman army was an advanced unit of soldiers that dominated the Mediterranean world and parts of what is now known as Western Europe. Some ancient history scholars believe that it took centuries later for a comparable fighting force to be developed after the fall of the Western empire.
The Roman army used a disciplined approach for an army at rest, on the march and in combat. The success of the legions was built on tried and true methods that certainly were not centured or based on how to punish anyone. To keep a fighting force in the field required a disciplined method of orderly logistics to function despite weather, natural barriers and the length of the supply line required.
After a days march for example a standardized method of camp was established to provide as much security and ability to de-camp in an orderly fashion.
Roman legions were known to their enemies to pursue their goals of victory relentlessly even after major setbacks. It takes a disciplined army to do this rather than panic and run. Yet even in retreat there was an established procedure to do that. Thus, saving lives and being in position to make ready for the next days events.
Certain battle tactics developed by the Greeks was also used on occasion by Roman legions. This was a battle field organization called the hoplite phalanx. This tactic required the utmost in the soldiers' discipline to execute.
In a word, strict. On the march, silence and order were enforced. The centurion had his ''vitis'' or vine stick that he used liberally to inflict beatings. The ''optio'' or centurion's second in command, walked behind the rear rank of the century and carried a long staff with which to strike anyone who dropped out of place or spoke. The death penalty was inflicted for a range of offenses. If a man were caught sleeping on guard duty, he was clubbed to death by the other members of his unit because he had put their lives at risk. Soldiers who fled from battle could be condemned to be crucified or thrown to wild beasts, even though these punishments were normally reserved for criminals and slaves, not citizens. If an entire unit fled from battle there was the decimation (used rarely, but available). In this punishment, one tenth of the soldiers were selected by lot to be executed. The remaining soldiers had to set up their tents and sleep out side the protection of the camps ramparts and for their rations were issued barley instead of wheat. For minor offenses, a soldier had to stand outside of his commander's tent for an entire day, in an unbelted tunic (the belt was a soldier's symbol) holding a heavy weight, such as a roll of sod or a log.
The Roman army was known for its discipline and it was made that way by their intensive training and the punishments dealt out to anyone who failed to obey.
The Roman army was known for its discipline and it was made that way by their intensive training and the punishments dealt out to anyone who failed to obey.
The Roman army was known for its discipline and it was made that way by their intensive training and the punishments dealt out to anyone who failed to obey.
The Roman army was known for its discipline and it was made that way by their intensive training and the punishments dealt out to anyone who failed to obey.
The Roman army was known for its discipline and it was made that way by their intensive training and the punishments dealt out to anyone who failed to obey.
The Roman army was known for its discipline and it was made that way by their intensive training and the punishments dealt out to anyone who failed to obey.
The Roman army was known for its discipline and it was made that way by their intensive training and the punishments dealt out to anyone who failed to obey.
The Roman army was known for its discipline and it was made that way by their intensive training and the punishments dealt out to anyone who failed to obey.
The Roman army was known for its discipline and it was made that way by their intensive training and the punishments dealt out to anyone who failed to obey.
The discipline in the Roman army was severe. The centurions and their optimos were primarily responsible for minor offenses. The centurion carried a "vitis" as his badge of office. This was a vine stick that he used to beat the soldiers for insubordination, talking in the ranks or dropping out of place on the march. His Optimo, or assistant had a long staff to also enforce discipline. More major offenses, needed the permission of superior officers. These were ordering a man caught sleeping on guard duty to be clubbed to death by members of the legion whose lives he may have put at risk; decimation, where every tenth man in a cohort was killed and the rest of the company being forced to pitch their tents outside the walls of the camp or fort and barley given for rations. This was done to a unit who disobeyed orders in a battle. If a man were caught running away from a battle, he could be crucified or thrown to the beasts, because the rules of citizenship did not apply to military offenses. There were other embarrassing duties for minor offenses.
The Romans used severe punishment (even death) to ensure good discipline.
The Roman army was known for its discipline and it was made that way by their intensive training and the punishments dealt out to anyone who failed to obey.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why were the roman army so successful for there tactics?
The Roman army was so successful in executing their battle tactics due to their discipline. They held their ground in situations where the enemy would break and run. Training, discipline and the will to win were all ingredients in an army's victory.
Did the roman empire lose its discipline and thus endanger the roman empire and cause it to be overrun?
The loss of discipline to the Roman army(again western empire) occurred late in the fall of Rome. It was largely caused by the sheer influx of foreign/barbarian troops to fill the legions that Roman citizens would not do. So I'd say no.
What did the roman army use to give signals?
wew
What does discipline in training relates to?
army values
Who was in te Roman army?
Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.Roman citizens were in the Roman army. These were reinforced by auxiliaries who were recruited from the provinces.
Why was roman army success?
The Roman army was so successful because of their strict discipline, rigorous training, and their will to win. They also had the best equipment and the "high-tech" weapons of their time and they knew how to use them.
How Romans have superb discipline?
The Roman army had superb discipline due to their training, both physical and psychological. They also had severe punishments for breach of discipline. So a recruit in the Roman army soon leaned to "do as he's told and to shut his mouth".
What wreaked the Roman army?
Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.Basically the Roman army was weakened by inaction which led to lack of discipline.
Did the ancient roman army lose its discipline and thus endanger the empire and cause it to be overrun?
Yes, the loss of discipline of the army was one of the reasons for the fall of the empire.
Why were the roman army so successful for there tactics?
The Roman army was so successful in executing their battle tactics due to their discipline. They held their ground in situations where the enemy would break and run. Training, discipline and the will to win were all ingredients in an army's victory.
What weakened roman army?
The Roman army became weakened because of lack of discipline, lack of good generals and officers and lack of battle experience.
What weapon was not used in the Roman army?
The roman army did not use nuclear weapons.
What strenghthen the Roman army?
The Roman army was strengthened by training and discipline. Training because they had the "high tech" weapons of their time and knew how to use them. Discipline, because the men knew full well the penalty for disobeying an order or running away from a battle. They were also pycologicaly strengthened by their commanders' giving them the pre-battle speeches, in which the enemy was degraded.The Roman army was strengthened by training and discipline. Training because they had the "high tech" weapons of their time and knew how to use them. Discipline, because the men knew full well the penalty for disobeying an order or running away from a battle. They were also pycologicaly strengthened by their commanders' giving them the pre-battle speeches, in which the enemy was degraded.The Roman army was strengthened by training and discipline. Training because they had the "high tech" weapons of their time and knew how to use them. Discipline, because the men knew full well the penalty for disobeying an order or running away from a battle. They were also pycologicaly strengthened by their commanders' giving them the pre-battle speeches, in which the enemy was degraded.The Roman army was strengthened by training and discipline. Training because they had the "high tech" weapons of their time and knew how to use them. Discipline, because the men knew full well the penalty for disobeying an order or running away from a battle. They were also pycologicaly strengthened by their commanders' giving them the pre-battle speeches, in which the enemy was degraded.The Roman army was strengthened by training and discipline. Training because they had the "high tech" weapons of their time and knew how to use them. Discipline, because the men knew full well the penalty for disobeying an order or running away from a battle. They were also pycologicaly strengthened by their commanders' giving them the pre-battle speeches, in which the enemy was degraded.The Roman army was strengthened by training and discipline. Training because they had the "high tech" weapons of their time and knew how to use them. Discipline, because the men knew full well the penalty for disobeying an order or running away from a battle. They were also pycologicaly strengthened by their commanders' giving them the pre-battle speeches, in which the enemy was degraded.The Roman army was strengthened by training and discipline. Training because they had the "high tech" weapons of their time and knew how to use them. Discipline, because the men knew full well the penalty for disobeying an order or running away from a battle. They were also pycologicaly strengthened by their commanders' giving them the pre-battle speeches, in which the enemy was degraded.The Roman army was strengthened by training and discipline. Training because they had the "high tech" weapons of their time and knew how to use them. Discipline, because the men knew full well the penalty for disobeying an order or running away from a battle. They were also pycologicaly strengthened by their commanders' giving them the pre-battle speeches, in which the enemy was degraded.The Roman army was strengthened by training and discipline. Training because they had the "high tech" weapons of their time and knew how to use them. Discipline, because the men knew full well the penalty for disobeying an order or running away from a battle. They were also pycologicaly strengthened by their commanders' giving them the pre-battle speeches, in which the enemy was degraded.
What complaints did Roman Soldiers about life in the Army?
The Roman soldier had the standard gripes about army life as present day soldiers. Some of these were the lack of sleep, the discipline, the amount of deductions from their pay, the attitude of their centurion, and the food.
Did the roman empire lose its discipline and thus endanger the roman empire and cause it to be overrun?
The loss of discipline to the Roman army(again western empire) occurred late in the fall of Rome. It was largely caused by the sheer influx of foreign/barbarian troops to fill the legions that Roman citizens would not do. So I'd say no.
What made the roman armies so strong?
Best weapons -------------------------------- Also the high discipline the the roman legions were very famous for, and the extensive training a legionnaire had to go through before joining the ranks of the army. Weapons and armor played a roll in improving the strength of the roman army as well.
What made the ancient roman army so successful?
The Roman army was so successful due to their discipline and training. The discipline was to follow orders (obviously) and their training was not only in the use of their weapons, but also a psychological one. Their officers told them that they were superior to their enemies, that they were Romans and therefore could not lose. The omens or signs that were taken before each encounter were always good and even if they lost a battle, they would come back and win the war because the gods were with them.
