It didn't, Christianity was practised in England long before 1066. Religion was probably the only thing that did not change after The Battle of Hastings.
The change caused by Harold's death and the Anglo-Saxon's defeat by the Normans, at the Battle of Hastings in 1066, was that William I of Normandy became the new King of England. He was crowned as King William I, though was usually known as William the Conqueror, or even William the Bastard.
They made people change their ¨Sir¨ names to match their occupation.
Because he couldn't sail to England to invade if the wind wasn't heading in the right direction.
yes and no because it was luck that made the wind change so the battle took place just after Harold godwinson had been fighting Harold hardraada. this meant that Harold godwinson's army was tired. no because he had been planning tactics for ages and Harold was unpropered.
They got caught up in wars against France
The change caused by Harold's death and the Anglo-Saxon's defeat by the Normans, at the Battle of Hastings in 1066, was that William I of Normandy became the new King of England. He was crowned as King William I, though was usually known as William the Conqueror, or even William the Bastard.
They made people change their ¨Sir¨ names to match their occupation.
Someone else became king and some of his men survived and some of them didnt
Because he couldn't sail to England to invade if the wind wasn't heading in the right direction.
there were actually 3 warring sides in the battle. read david howarth's 1066: year of the conqest Irrespective of how many sides there were, I do not believe that there would have been "breaks" to regroup, change tactics and maybe have a nice cup of tea?
yes and no because it was luck that made the wind change so the battle took place just after Harold godwinson had been fighting Harold hardraada. this meant that Harold godwinson's army was tired. no because he had been planning tactics for ages and Harold was unpropered.
They got caught up in wars against France
Well... This can not be answered correctly because it will change in the future and has changed in the past. Hope that is will be a help to you!
yes the wind did change the battle because if the wind hadn't changed direction William wouldn't have been able to get over the English chanel and land in England where he wanted
In addition to the obvious change of ruler, his reign also saw a programme of building and fortification, changes to the English language, a shift in the upper levels of society and the church, and adoption of some aspects of continental church reform.
there were no new arguments
natural selection!