The reaction of mainstream society changed over time and was very different in different regions. Many conservative Americans were shocked by the Civil Rights Movement and felt it was a betrayal of their values. Some extremists bombed churches and killed leaders of the Civil Rights movement.
Many Americans were initially unsure of the Civil Rights movement and its leaders. After Dr. King's I Have a Dream speech, which was very emotional and captivating, large numbers of white Americans began to support the Civil Rights movement. There were still huge numbers who did not.
Some supported the Civil Rights movement from its first inception. Some of the earliest leaders within the NAACP and similar organizations were white. Young people who became adults in the 1960s and 1970s nearly all supported civil rights.
The question as phrased requires a plural answer, but I can only speak for myself and the experience that was mine. I was born in 1955 in south Georgia. My parents were not wealthy or anything close to it, but we had what we needed. My father sold insurance, my mother stayed home with the kids. (I was #4)
We always had a black girl or woman that helped my mom around the house. There was even a time when we had three (more kids then) and there was one girl that only 'took care' of the kids. We were very close to our mom, but with so many kids, washing, cleaning, even playing with us was a lot for one woman. The young black girl that I grew up knowing was called Bunny. I don't remember her real name, my parents do. She was great. Very patient. You can imagine with rambunctious kids, especially my older brother and I. Bunny worked for my mom for about 3 years before we moved. When we moved, we all cried. She loved us, we loved her.
Both of my parents grew up passing many hours in company of black people. My mom's dad and brother hired black men to help on the farm. My uncle especially had one father/son team that were as good as farmers as there were in the county, my mom says. The father was called Gator, a nickname from somewhere, but my uncle respected his judgment and had him oversee two farms. Gator owned his house on my uncle's farm, owned his own car. He would go to town on business for my uncle, this what my mother tells me, and the storeowners would treat him as a regular customer, but she said many didn't like it. This was south Georgia, after all. Not everybody was raised to respect what a man did more than what he looked like.
Schools were segregated of course everywhere in the mid-late fifties, so my exposure to black children my age was practically nothing. I did come to know the ladies that cooked for my grandmother in the restaurant she and her husband owned. I remember Cora May and Maggie. They seemed friendly and pleasant. They certainly tolerated me being in their kitchen, obviously, my grandmother owned the place, but I never felt that they were anything but sincere in our conversations. They would tell me about the foods they were cooking, even let me work the potato slicer once! That was fun.
In that time, African-Americans were generally referred to as 'persons of color,' 'colored people,' 'Negroes,' and sometimes 'black.' Those terms came in and out of use/popularity. They were not used as slurs, not in our house. My parents did not use the term 'n*****.' We were reprimanded severely if we ever did, for we heard it many times at school or on the playground. My parents taught us to respect people older than we were and to watch for what a person did to determine his character and personality.
When the civil rights movement really picked up speed - at least getting into my range of thinking, public opinion was so much influenced by media, even then, and of course people talking to people, taking sides, etc. I started seeing just how large the gap between 'ordinary American' whites and 'ordinary American' blacks at the time was. Huge. The theory of 'separate but equal' had been proven as a failure, schools were de-segregated and now you had first-hand knowledge of the 'race issue.'
By this time we had moved to Charleston, SC. My high school was fortunate. We had very few open fights, like others around us. I think the football team was a big part of that. The team meshed quickly - black players from their school, white players from the school being de-segregated. The team had virtually no black/white problems, but a number of friendships were formed that set the example for the entire school and still exist today, thirty years later.
There was a lot of white public sentiment, I recall, that felt like the courts were taking opportunity away from whites to give to blacks, but it's clear now just how narrow that thinking was. Opportunity can be everywhere, and if you seize it it doesn't stop me from doing the same. Integrating the schools was the obvious move to finally improve the educational possibilities for black kids.
We've come so far since then, at least in years. Martin was shot by a white man. If you push aside the capital offense of murder, and a father/husband taken from his family, you still have such a tremendous act. The impact still hits. Dr. King was clearly a man with a vision of what the social fabric in America could be. If he had lived, I am convinced that far greater advances in society would have come about. There would be far more black doctors, lawyers, engineers, scientists, teachers, governors...his death was a blow for every American.
Through these years, I have encountered many persons who live outside the south. They comment on the racial struggles, the evidence of continued prejudice. Very often they don't understand the foundational differences, skin color aside, that have proven such effective impediments to success. But, I see signs that things continue to improve.
Dr. King and others fought for respect as persons of character. I was taught at an early age to give that respect to all who deserved it, regardless of color, education, career or social status. I am grateful to my parents for that teaching.
young people in SNCC and the MFDP felt betrayed by some civil rights leaders because civil rights leaders such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton became corrupt and stole money from them OR SNCC was taken over by militant Stokely Carmichael (05/66). MFDP allowed to watch {not participate} in 1964 Dem. Party convention.
young people in SNCC and the MFDP felt betrayed by some civil rights leaders because civil rights leaders such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton became corrupt and stole money from them OR SNCC was taken over by militant Stokely Carmichael (05/66). MFDP allowed to watch {not participate} in 1964 Dem. Party convention.
becuse the government was changing and people hade more rights
The NAACP is important for many reasons. The organization has been able to help with many civil rights issues over the years. They have also been able to change legislation to create equal rights for minorities.
Actually, this famous speech makes few demands. It instead tries to uplift and empower his audience-- both black people and white people. It is an aspirational speech (he hopes there will come a time when people will be judged by what they do in life, rather than by the color of their skin); and it is also an inspirational speech (he especially tries to encourage black people who feel their struggle has been so difficult, and he calls upon them to continue moving forward). Dr. King uses verses from the Bible to call for justice and ethical behavior. And he also points the finger at segregationists and racists, like certain southern governors and police chiefs, criticizing them for viciously attacked peaceful protesters. In short, this brilliant speech calls upon those in the Civil Rights Movement to continue their efforts, even when they encounter resistance and bigotry; and he calls upon them to never give up, and to continue working towards putting an end to racism.
Disability lawyer specialize in advancing the rights of people with disability. They will help those who feel their rights have been violated and seek to enforce disability law and civil rights.
One social issue that caused civil unrest in American in the last part of the 20th century was the right for blacks to attend the same schools as whites. There was a civil rights movement, a feminist movement, and those who protested the war in Vietnam.
Some disadvantages of civil rights may include resistance or backlash from certain individuals or groups who feel threatened by the changes, challenges in implementation and enforcement of the laws, and potential conflicts between different rights or interests. Additionally, civil rights movements can sometimes be long and arduous processes that require significant resources and perseverance.
BARACk fEElSz thAt NO WARS ShOUld BE GOiNG ON ANd thE CiVil RiGhtSz NEEd tO BE ChANGEd =] ( i GUESSEd*]
young people in SNCC and the MFDP felt betrayed by some civil rights leaders because civil rights leaders such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton became corrupt and stole money from them OR SNCC was taken over by militant Stokely Carmichael (05/66). MFDP allowed to watch {not participate} in 1964 Dem. Party convention.
young people in SNCC and the MFDP felt betrayed by some civil rights leaders because civil rights leaders such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton became corrupt and stole money from them OR SNCC was taken over by militant Stokely Carmichael (05/66). MFDP allowed to watch {not participate} in 1964 Dem. Party convention.
The strngths and weaknesses are defined irrationally. Although they do grant Personal civil liberties to minority groups they are defined lightly. some people feel as if in lamesn terms they give too much freedom.
it was the confederate
While the Civil Rights Movement took place decades ago, many people have their rights violated everyday. In some situations, the violation could include harassment or even loss of employment. If you feel that your rights have been violated, and want to pursue a legal case against the violator, you should hire a civil rights attorney. While a civil rights attorney can be expensive, there are many benefits to having one on your side during the legal proceedings. The first reason why you should hire a civil rights attorney if you feel that your civil rights have been violated is because the attorney will often give you a free consultation about your situation. A civil rights attorney will sit with you to discuss exactly what happened to you, and how it may have violated your civil rights. If they attorney feels that your rights have been violated, they will also discuss the following steps that could be followed if you want to pursue a lawsuit or settlement, and how you could stand to benefit if everything in the case works out in your favor. They will also discuss any negative repercussions that could come with pursuing the case. The second reason why you should hire a civil rights attorney is because the attorney will contact the person or organization that you felt violated your civil rights, and begin a settlement process. This process can often take a lot of time, and constant deliberation between your attorney and the violator's attorney. Often times it will require you to meet with the violators to discuss the situation and how you felt your civil rights were violated. While some civil rights attorneys may take the case pro bono, or work for a percentage of the settlement, others will charge you an upfront fee to begin the process, plus an hourly fee for the amount of time they work on your case. The third reason why you should hire a civil rights attorney is that they will defend you in court. If your case cannot be settled out of court, the next step would be to sue the violator in a civil court. This process can be extremely time consuming and expensive if the attorney requires hourly billing. However, having the attorney on your side to prepare and present your case will give you a much better chance of winning the case.
No. He only began the movement that has taken us this far. Many people were against the civil rights movement and a file was made on KIng by the FBI that would have been used against him if he had sought public office. I don't think he wanted to seek a office of any sort as well.
Of course. The feminism movement in itself isn't meant to be a "men hate" - group. Their main goals have been since the start of the movement to get women equal rights on different social subjects. Sadly, the movement is nowadays seen as a men hate movement. To answer the original question - yes, feminists can be romantics even though they are feminists. So can people who are men's rights activists. They can as well be romantics, they just want to be heard on subjects where they feel women are getting more rights.
People began to feel unfairly oppressed.