the citizens of that state had to pick a citizen who they knew would guide the through the harsh times
two famous rulers of the fertile crescent were the sumerian rulers and the Euphrates because they had more goods to supply to people
bc they exchanges them for gold,guns and other goods.
It was a "this for that" system. Rulers gave their people protection, and the people gave the rulers crops.... that sort of thing.
China would have flooded
the citizens of that state had to pick a citizen who they knew would guide the through the harsh times
if the rulers are good and have the thought to help people then they will try or rulers will complete their right wishes and if rulers are bad they will not complete people wishes or they will complete by taking bribe from people
Rulers should show how good they are to there people because the people get there character from there rulers, and maybe the people might do some bad to them if the rulers don't treat then very good.
They come from beliefs of kings or rulers
from his mother...
China.
They came from Cajamarca.
The rulers of libya are picked by the nominations from the people.
whoever want to sex me come to will branch
People living under the Pharaohs basically had no rights as we know them. The rulers were absolute rulers.
I think rulers would benefit from it if they claimed that they were chosen by gods to be the rulers because then the people would be more respectful and treat the rulers with utmost loyalty. More power because people din't want the gods fury.
they were called absolute rulers because people believe that they have absolute powers granted by god so the people need to follow the rulers. The rulers also have divine-rights and they were responsible to no one but god.